I'm using a custom Navigation already.. however this takes up a good chunk
of viewing space.
It would be far smoother to allow a user to click on the "coloured" band
just outside the navigational panels and collapse that, similar to how one
can collapse panels. I could do my own implementation of this if I knew how
to define the vertical accordion (scriptaculous defines this but there
doesn't seem to be a simple override in the wiki code to show both in the
same page).
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jun 11, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Joe wrote:
Thanks Guillaume,
Actually, turns out it's even simpler; I followed the "Preferences"
page.
If I get some time this week, I'll put up a code snippet for using it.
One tiny additional thing: how to define if I want to use vertical?
The
scriptaculous version supports this; and it would be useful to add
this
feature to the panel "navigation" - so that more view space can be
easily
acquired.
No idea about your question. However it's not recommended to use the
navigation panel since it's very performance intensive. It'll load all
docs in memory and for all pages. It's ok on small wikis but doesn't
scale.
The general solution is to create your own navigation as we've done in
the default Wiki.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Guillaume
Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> I guess there's 3 solutions :
>
> 1. Recommended one : look at the class edition page code (I'm not
> quite
> sure where that is though, Firebug might help you find it) and see
> how
> its
> rico accordion was replaced with a scriptaculous one
> 2. Second one : check on the Prototype / Scriptaculous websites
> how you
> can build an accordion
> 3. Other one : copy a rico.js file from an older XWiki distrib
> (say, 1.3)
> and paste it into your 1.4 wiki's albatross skin folder
> (YourWikiFolder
> webapps >
xwiki > skins > albatross) -> I guess this should make
> the JS
> resources available again... Though probably at the detriment of
> performance.
>
> Guillaume
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Joe <uncannyhg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it's a move in the right direction, standardization is good.
>> However.. it still leaves me somewhat in the lurch as I want to
>> use the
>> toucan system (the page listed indicates this new project is a bit
>> far
> down
>> the line).
>> Is there no method available in the current (1.4.1) toucan
>> implementation
>> for accordion style content inside a panel?
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <
guillaume(a)xwiki.com
>
wrote:
> Hi Mihail,
>
> 2008/6/11 Mihails Agafonovs <_muxa(a)inbox.lv>lv>:
>
>> Why Rico has been deleted?
>
>
> There's an ongoing discussion (search for "javascript framework" on
>
http://xwiki.markmail.org/ for more info) on which JS framework
> XWiki
> should
> standardize on. AFAIR right now the choice is to focus on rewriting
every
> XWiki interface using Prototype +
Scriptaculous.
>
> However once the Interface Extensions (
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/InterfaceExtensions)
> will
be
> ready I think you'll be able to plug and
use the JS code of your
> choice
for
> your applications...
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://wikibc.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users