It's stable from my POV. It's being used in
production on
On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Ryszard Łach wrote:
Hi.
Could anyone, please, give any info about status of filesystem
attachment storage?
Is it stable?
Caleb can probably answer better here since he's the one who implemented
this.
My POV:
* It's supposed to be usable
* We need more real life reports that it's working fine in production
* We've received some bug reports already. Several have been fixed, there
might still be some open issues. You could search open issues about
"filesystem" on
http://jira.xwiki.org to know specific details
* One current limitation I know is that clustering is not easily done
since you need to cluster the filesystem. This can be achieved with a NFS
mount for example.
Does it deal with non-ascii filenames prolerply?
No idea. Caleb?
If so - why in 3.4 versions default storage for
attachments will be
hibernate?
Filesystem storage is not a perfect solution:
* clustering issue mentioned above
* it makes it harder to backup your XWiki system since you need to backup
not only the DB but also the directory where the attachments are saved.
It's nice to know that everything is in the DB.
* the filesystem is one additional point of failure
Ideally we would not need filesystem storage at all since DBs should be
able to stream arbitrary data in a performant manner. In practice only some
DBs support this (MySQL doesn't AFAIK).
All that said I completely agree with your question. I'd also like that we
answer it better and that we post this status on
xwiki.org.
So guys, can you complement/correct what I've said above so that we can
get a correct statement about this feature? :)
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org