RE: [xwiki-users] Accessing Groovy function from velocity

A small note about the separate groovy page (I made note of this in the page you put in JV): When you create the page, it cannot have "<%" and "%>". If it does, then it won't work (understandable, a lot of other languages work this way when a separate file used as a source, eg Javascript). However, this then results in your class being shown in plain text in the saved document (this occurs in B2 and B4, can't test B3 as it's not running on our test environment anymore) - which I would not like to see user's having any view access to. I'm unsure of what to suggest around this, or if it is even a concern. Naturally, if "parseGroovyFromString" would allow the "<%%>" then the page would be protected by default from the user (being correctly assessed as a Groovy page), BUT this is not quite a good solution. Perhaps it would help if there are some flags for the page that do not break the "parseGroovyFromString" method, but signify to Xwiki that the page is Groovy (and so needs programming rights to modify or save, and does not show content). For example: $doc.isVelocityInclude public class xyz { groovy code } Once the Xwiki engine sees $doc.isVelocityInclude, it treats the page as velocity and won't save without programming rights, and won't display it's content on viewing the document. Not sure if this is even an issue though. Thoughts? -----Original Message----- From: Esbach, Brandon [mailto:Esbachb@tycoelectronics.com] Sent: 16 February 2007 09:32 To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org Subject: RE: [xwiki-users] Accessing Groovy function from velocity Ahh, nice job! Many thanks, it's a lot clearer now! -----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vincent@massol.net] Sent: 16 February 2007 08:06 To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Accessing Groovy function from velocity Hi JV, Very cool. I've linked your tutorial from http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/ bin/view/DevGuide/Tutorials Thanks -Vincent On Feb 15, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: