19 Sep
2009
19 Sep
'09
11:18 p.m.
On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 23:09, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
How can he tag with papercut if he doesn't know if it's a trivial
issue (since the definition of a paper cut is that it's a trivial
issue)! :)
On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
The idea is that if it's a user submitted issue, the user might not
know the
difficulty of the issue and he will just mark it with the tag. Hi,
I think this initiative is great and will help improved our UX.
The paper cut issues could be great for anyone wanting to start
participating in open source and want a small bug to fix (like GSOC
students
:p )
Related jira issues could be just linked to this jira task.
Instead of linking them we could tag them with paperCut, maybe we
like this
approach better.
User could tag the issues with paperCut and developers should rate
the
issue's difficulty and priority.
I don't see the difference between a "papercut" tag and the
"trivial"
difficulty. Could you explain?
If the
developer comes and marks it difficult, we still know that the user
though
that the issue needed attention and raises an usability problem.
I don't think papercut == usability issue. For usability issues we
should tag them with "usability" IMO since the need is more general
than just for papercuts.
Thanks
-Vincent
>> Regarding
>>
>>> Trivial:
>>>
> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&request…
>>>
>> we are targeting just the issues in the CORE? there are lots of
>> trivial
>> issues in other components.
>
> See my previous mail. I mentioned the need to have the difficulty
> custom field in other jira projects too...
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent