On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:30, Raluca Stavro
<raluca.morosan(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think about this:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-va…
?
I like this one, i voted for
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/LogoChallenge#HProposal8Raluc…
after all ;)
>
> Raluca.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> Hello Community,
>>
>> The search for the
XWiki.org logo isn't over yet...
>>
>> The second round of votes finished, with the following results:
>>
>> +9 for 4
>> +4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12)
>> +1 for 15
>> +14 for 16
>> +1 for 19
>>
>> Normally, 16 would be the winner, but since several key members of the
>> community objected to it, I see three ways to proceed:
>>
>> 1. Declare 16 as the elected logo, but further improve it to soften the
>> objections
>> 2. Start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
>> 3. Slow down a bit, since there's no hard deadline to meet, and start
>> all over, accepting new proposals
>>
>> I for one would go for option 1, if Vincent, Ludovic, Guillaume, Fabio
>> agree.
>>
>> On 04/08/2010 06:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>> Hello XWiki Community,
>>>
>>> We're still looking for the new
XWiki.org logo. First of all, many
>>> thanks to all those who submitted their ideas (
>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallenge ). After the
>>> first round of votes (digest here:
>>>
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ah6DqXzfHT2vdHV5Ty1LX3lKU3U5V3M4YmN…)=en),
>>>
>>> we chose 6 "popular" proposals for the second round:
>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 .
>>>
>>> The authors of these proposals were asked to do the following, if not
>>> already done for round 1:
>>> * try to integrate any constructive feedback that came with the
>>> votes (a digest of the feedback from the emails is available for each
>>> proposal on
>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 )
>>> * polish the design (if they consider it necessary)
>>> * provide the requested variations for .org, enterprise and office
>>> * provide samples for light and dark background
>>> * provide a black&white version
>>> * provide a 16X16 icon containing the logo or a representative part
>>> of the logo
>>> * provide a nice "Powered by XWiki" button that goes with the logo
>>> * provide a mockup/screenshot with the logo used in the current
>>> skin, colibri
>>>
>>> For most of the finalist logos, the _final_ versions were already
>>> uploaded here:
>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 .
>>> For those who were not updated, we will use the initial submissions
>>> for round 2 as well,
>>> and voters will have to use their imagination in case
>>> any of the required use cases is missing.
>>>
>>>
>>> VOTING:
>>>
>>> You can send your vote on the mailing list (devs(a)xwiki.org or
>>> users(a)xwiki.org), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time.
>>>
>>> Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one of the 6 finalists
>>> (
>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2#HFinalistpropo…
>>> ).
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: Before choosing a logo based on your personal preference,
>>> please try to also ask yourself the following questions:
>>>
>>> * Is it distinctive? Note that it should not resemble other logos,
>>> including the XWiki
SAS/xwiki.com logo.
>>> * Is it easy to remember and recognize?
>>> * Does it blend in smoothly with the Colibri skin? With the new
>>>
XWiki.org skin? Note that adjustments to the skin is possible, in order
>>> to better integrate with the logo.
>>> * Is the design scalable? Could it (or parts of it) be
>>> successfully used in a 16X16 icon? Would it look good on a very large
>>> poster?
>>> * Can it be used (as it is, or adapted) on both light and dark backgrounds?
>>> * What would it look like in black and white (not just grayscale)?
>>> It's ok if some details are lost, but it needs to still look
>>> attractive and keep the main features.
>>>
>>>
>>> TIMELINE:
>>>
>>> 08/Apr/10 : Beginning of second round of votes on devs(a)xwiki.org,
>>> users(a)xwiki.org
>>> 11/Apr/10 : End of votes
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,