17 Apr
2009
17 Apr
'09
10:41 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Jonas Almfeldt wrote:
[snip]
Then something wrong happens in wysiwyginput.vm template. This is what I
have http://pastebin.com/m118b997b . Can try the
following:
(1) Replace line 16 with
#set($content = "**nobug**")
and refresh the page containing "bug". What the output if you append
xpage=wysiwyginput&render to the query string of the view URL?
http://server:8080/xwiki/bin/view/Sandbox/test+2?xpage=wysiwyginput&ren…
the output:
**nobug**
(2) Revert the previous change. Replace line 28 with
#set($content = $tdoc.getRenderedContent("**nobug**", $tdoc.getSyntaxId()))
and refresh again. What's the output now?
Output of
http://server:8080/xwiki/bin/view/Sandbox/test+2?xpage=wysiwyginput&ren…
now:
**bug**
and if I edit the page, the wysiwyg opens up displaying:
**bug**
So the condition in the if statement on line 27: #if($request.render) does
not seem to be satisfied.
See my result for (3) below.
[snip]
(3) Revert the changes from (1) and (2) and instead of
xpage=wysiwyginput&render
put
xpage=wysiwyginput&render=true
in the query string of the view URL. What's the output this time?
I suspect the WAS environment doesn't support query string parameters
without a value.
Maurius, your suspicion seems very likely! :-)
When I have reverted changes (1) and (2), and using url: with render=true
instead of just render
it displays
*
bug
in bold text, just as it should do.
*
Thanks for having such good patience to guide me through the
troubleshooting!
Is this a bug in WAS 6.1? or is it actually following some servlet standard
more strictly than other application servers do? or just interpreting the
standard more strictly perhaps :-)
How can we solve this?
Will this be adressed in a coming xwiki release?
Kind regards,
Jonas