9 Feb
2017
9 Feb
'17
1:48 p.m.
Agreed,
The longer you leave it, the longer people might use it instead of the
official. As of today, the official isn't even the first to appear in the
list when you search for xwiki in dockerhub (but I suspect this will soon
change as people start pulling it).
And people who already have pulled it won't be affected aside from the fact
that they won't get updates, so no impact for them.
Regards,
Denis
2017-02-09 11:40 GMT+01:00 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
Ok so now that we have an official xwiki image on
dockerhub at
https://hub.docker.com/_/xwiki/ we need to decide what we do with
https://hub.docker.com/r/xwiki/xwiki-mysql-tomcat/
I think we should remove it to avoid confusion.
Anyone having any issue with me removing it now? WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 16 Jan 2017, at 18:37, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I’ve started a first version of a XWiki docker packaging at
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/docker-xwiki and I’ve created an
automated build on DockerHub at https://hub.docker.com/u/xwiki/. The goal
is to provide an official packaging done by the XWiki dev team.
Since I’m a recent user of Docker I’m sure I’ve made plenty of mistakes
and not
following some best practices, even though I’ve tried my best to do
that ;)
So it would be great if:
* Some users could try it out and let me know how it works
* Users could tell me what they’d expect in term of setup from a docker
distribution.
* Some Docker experts review my code and let me
know what I should
improve!
After I receive some confirmation that it works well-enough, my goal is
to
document it as an official way of installing xwiki on xwiki.org.
Feel free to create jiras for ideas and bugs at
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XDOCKER.
Thanks a lot!
-Vincent
PS: Note that I’m sure some will want a different DB, such as postgreSQL
for
example. That should be easy to do. Pull request accepted! :)