Hi Simon,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Simon Glet <simon.glet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Glad to see you stick with XWiki long enough to put the effort needed to
make things work fine... Now you'll be rewarded for your patience ;-)
Looking forward to more useful feedback about XWiki,
Guillaume
Best Regards
Simon Glet
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Simon Glet <simon.glet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wow that was fast !
Thanks to Asiri and Vincent.
Simon Glet
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Simon Glet wrote:
>
>> Jeremie,
>>
>> I see your point but I wasn't expecting that much involvement ;-) BTW,
>> as you speak of customization, I was wondering how to hide the "Import
>> Office Document" menu. By not offering the option, users will not get
>> frustrated and would more easily accept the system.
>
> With the latest XE version (2.2RC1 or even better 2.2RC2 being released
right
now, will be avail in 2-3 hours) if the office importer page
(XWiki.OfficeImporter) is not present the menu item will not be shown. So
you can rename that page or delete it (you'd then need to reimport the
officeimporter XAR later on if you want it again in this case).
>
> Of course you can also customize the menu vm files to define the rules
you
want.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Simon Glet
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
>> <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> Some words from a long-time user of XWiki ...
>>>
>>> I think the issues you encountered might be linked also to the fact
that
>>> these features rely on external tools
(oo, ms office...), and also
they are
>>> quite "recent" in xwiki
history. So for sure, all integration issues
might
>>> not have been encountered / fixed
already.
>>> Of course if you need mainly these features, it might be a problem,
but with
>>> some fixes there is no reason they
won't work.
>>>
>>> For the rest, I must say that on the other side, and even with some
(known)
>>> flaws, xwiki is not comparable to
other wikis I know. No one offers
such
>>> liberty and customization
possibilities. I use it for some years now
at work
>>> (since v0.9) and migrated regularly
to last versions, and progression
is
>>> incredible, in terms of features and
usability. A good basis is now in
>>> place, and I think not much is needed to have a nearly perfect tool :)
>>> But, again, this tool might need some involvement in order to get its
best,
>>> even if it's more and more
"plug & play".
>>>
>>> I'll take an example, in my office we use a specific configuration
>>> management tool very uncommon, and that is integrated with nothing
else. In
>>> wiki I could very easily create some
macros to help users create links
on
>>> various sources, reports and such in
this scm tool. The wysiwyg editor
works
>>> really well now, and the new macro
displays in a dialog with
parameters I
>>> defined, though I didn't code
anything for the display. This is really
>>> helpful and really easy to put in place. I don't know much other
tools, but
>>> I don't think you can do this
kind of thing so easily... For now I did
not
>>> install oO server for office import
though, but I plan to.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jeremie
>>>
>>> 2010/2/9 Simon Glet <simon.glet(a)gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi Asiri,
>>>>
>>>> I am a little confused by the quality of XWiki 2.1.1. At this point I
>>>> find that there are many features that don't work properly or at all
:
>>>>
>>>> - Office plugin (the office 2007 ribbon has a very buggy behavior)
>>>> - Document import (There is no documentation about version
>>>> compatibility between the different elements)
>>>> - Usage with SQL Server 2005 is impossible. Works fine with
PostgreSQL
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>> I can't continue testing such a product. To bad, it looked very
good.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Simon Glet
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Asiri Rathnayake
>>>> <asiri.rathnayake(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Simon Glet
<simon.glet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Asiri,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I currently use the latest version of OO (3.1.1 Build 9420). What
else
>>>>>> can I check ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you can try un-installing openoffice and reinstalling. But I
doubt
>>>>> this will help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next thing you can try is use jodconverter directly and try to
convert
>>>> your
>>>>> document from odt to html.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the link:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://code.google.com/p/jodconverter/
>>>>>
>>>>> How to use it:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://code.google.com/p/jodconverter/wiki/GettingStarted
>>>>>
>>>>> If the command-line conversion fails for your document, then the
error
>>>>> should probably be reported
to jodconverter users list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Asiri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Simon Glet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Asiri Rathnayake
>>>>>> <asiri.rathnayake(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you have understood it seems the problem is with your OOo
>>>>>> installation.
>>>>>>> Can you try removing your existing OOo installation and
installing
the
>>>>> latest version from
http://www.openoffice.org? This will most
>> probably
>>>> fix
>>>>> the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Asiri
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge