Hi Eugen, Thanks for taking the time to share this. I definitely agree with issues 1 and 2. They're really important. I also agree about issue 3 although it's slightly less important than the other 2. Listing tested DBs in the Release notes is a good idea. Actually what I would have liked to do is to go further than this and have various agents on jenkins running on various DBs (HSQLDB, PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle) to ensure that all our tests run fine on these DBs all the time. I've been wanting to have this for a long time now but it's not happened yet :( Of course patches (even better: github pull requests!) are more welcome to help us fixing these issues. Thanks -Vincent On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Eugen Colesnicov wrote:

Thank you, Caleb, But JIRA says, that I can't vote on the topics I issued, so 0 means +1 :-) Kind regards, Dmitry 20 октября 2011, 12:49 от Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com>om>: > I have just assigned myself XWIKI-6918 and XWIKI-6917, the bugs. > You can go ahead and vote on the feature requests (resume download and webdav access) and we can see where things go from there. > > Caleb > > On 10/20/2011 04:02 AM, Haru Mamburu wrote: > > Hi, All > > > > Also, I'd add all bug fixes with file storage system, because for now, I have had to switch off (in 3.2): > > > > - versioning of attachment > > - recycle bin for attachment > > > > to use it more or less seamless. Otherwise, there is a big mess with deleted attachment occure. Everything I found, "JIRAded" already: XWIKI-6989, XWIKI-6921, XWIKI-6918, XWIKI-6917. > > Would be nice also to have resume download for big files: XWIKI-6921 > > > > So, we have a new feature, but with a very limited functionality, that really works. Moreover, not each and every core functions really support attachments, stored in FS. For projects with big and huge attachments these topics are essential, IMO. > > > > Some additional support for cyrillic XWIKI-6955 is also welcome to put in plan. :-) > > > > Best regards, > > > > Dmitry Bakbardin > > > > > > 20 октября 2011, 11:25 от Eugen Colesnicov <ecolesnicov(a)gmail.com>om>: > >> Hello developers! > >> > >> I seen your thread about XE 3.3 Roadmap + Finishing the 3.x cycle. In this > >> post also described jira-requests, which you planned to resolve in a near > >> future. > >> > >> All is great, the general strategy and each step are right, but also exists > >> some other important issues (I think that its are important) and I want to > >> put your attention on its. If is it possible, can you analyze possibility to > >> include these issues in your nearly plans? > >> > >> 1. XE-1032 - XWiki 3.2 totally cannot work on Oracle (upgrade & fresh > >> install failed). I think, it is important issue, because supporting of > >> Oracle are declared - but in realty XE 3.2 is not supporting Oracle. > >> > >> To the future, maybe is good proposal, same as you wrote in a 3.2 release > >> notes - which browsers are tested & supporting - also will write witch DB > >> are tested & supporting. I can test new releases on Oracle. > >> > >> 2. XE-324 - allow special (russian and asian) characters in attachment names > >> - very old issue, but I think is important, because without it - you cannot > >> declare that XWiki have normal multi-language support. All modern > >> web-platforms & applications now have this possibility (wikis, web-mails, > >> social applications, etc.) only XWiki is lagging... > >> > >> 3. XWIKI-2870 - Ability to select query language in Database List property. > >> This is more for developers, and also very old issue. I think it is > >> important, because if you did something modern (in this case - XWQL) - need > >> to support this in all "parts" of platform... If you didn't do this - your > >> great work for modern features - looks like as "garbage" - I cannot use XWQL > >> in Database List property - as a result - I am not using XWQL at all, > >> because I don't want to write queries 2 times. > >> > >> If is it possible, can you analyze possibility to include these issues in > >> your nearly plans? > >> > >> PS. Maybe another users know some more important unresolved issues? I think, > >> user opinions will be interesting for developers! > >> > >> Thanks beforehand! > >> Eugen Colesnicov > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/4Developers-more-important-issues-regardi… > >> Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> users mailing list > >> users(a)xwiki.org > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users(a)xwiki.org > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users >

2011/10/20 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>: Just my two pennyworth as a confluence convert.... Although the installation instructions will not change much with each release, if they were specific to each release it might encourage more relevant comments and updates from other users. At present if you look on the installation notes, the comments start years ago... If there was a new page for each release, then the comments would (hopefully) be relevant to that release. making them a much more usable resource. This could be done by just creating a copy of the page (without comments but with all relevant changes) for each new release in just the same way as the release notes are updated for each release. I am also affected by the Oracle issue, and am now having to rethink what we will use as a database back end. Cheers

On 10/20/2011 04:02 AM, Haru Mamburu wrote: Heh, I was just implementing XWIKI-6921, finishing it in a few hours. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/