On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Arioch <AriochThe(a)gmail.com> wrote: It has actually been renamed to xwiki-platform-administration-ui. You can find it on http://maven.xwiki.org/releases/org/xwiki/platform/xwiki-platform-administr…. -- Thomas Mortagne

Sandbox pages are still XWiki 1.0 syntax That leads to funny consequences. 1) When i click on Edit i get the "unsupported browser" warning This i think is relatively easy to fix, even if boring. Frankly, sandbox is intended to teach user of current syntax, not of obsolete one. submit ticket ? 2) When i import office file i get broken rendering. File is imported as XWiki 2 syntax but is without check or conversion copy-pasted into page current syntax. Well, more to add into my Office Import UI ticket :-) ---- 3) strange effect - i switch XWiki to Russian UI, then i import page set like xwiki-platform-administration-ui-4.2-milestone-2.xar or xwiki-enterprise-ui-all-4.2-milestone-2.xar - and my wiki suddenly switched to English language without any prompt. Is it by design ? I did not expected those turns. -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/ANN-XWiki-Enterprise-and-XWiki-Enterprise… Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Maybe they can have the page but not that value ? And it looks fragile. What if those XAR's would have different snapshots of the page - the outcome would depend upon order they were applied in ? -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/ANN-XWiki-Enterprise-and-XWiki-Enterprise… Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Arioch <AriochThe(a)gmail.com> wrote: What are you talking about? :| There's no Sandbox page in XWiki 1.0 syntax in the default distribution. See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-enterprise/tree/master/xwiki-enterprise-ui/s… . They all have been converted to XWiki 2.0 syntax 3 years ago.. see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XE-472 . No. You get the warning because you have the old WYSIWYG editor which is not maintained any more. I don't know how you end up with pages in XWiki 1.0 syntax but that's not a clean XWiki Enterprise 4.2 Milestone 2 for sure. Not really. First of all a document can have only one wiki syntax. You can't mix multiple wiki syntaxes inside a document content. Then, the office importer code clearly throws an exception ( https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/master/xwiki-platform-core/xwi… ) if you choose to append the result and the syntax of the target document (XWiki 1.0 in your case) doesn't match the specified syntax (XWiki 2.0, as specified by the office import application). Marius

On 08/09/2012 03:47 AM, Arioch wrote: If you disabled some syntaxes, make sure you didn't accidentally (or intentionally) disabled the xwiki/2.0 or xwiki/2.1 syntaxes. If you did disable them, then a document in a disabled syntax will be in that syntax, but the Document Information panel will not display it in the list of possible syntaxes, and thus the first syntax in the list will appear to be selected, and that is xwiki/1.0. Since the xwiki/1.0 syntax is not implemented in the new rendering engine, but as a legacy syntax with its own rendering engine, disabling it doesn't actually work; it will always be listed in the list of possible syntaxes unless you modify the Document Information panel and explicitly remove it. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

On 08/09/2012 11:42 AM, Arioch wrote: No, as Marius said, the Sandbox is in the xwiki/2.0 syntax: https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-enterprise/blob/master/xwiki-enterprise-ui/s… https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-enterprise/blob/master/xwiki-enterprise-ui/s… You can check locally, *before* editing and re-saving a document: http://localhost:8080/xwiki/bin/view/Sandbox/?xpage=xml (check the syntaxId element) Here's the commit that changed the syntax, from almost three years ago: https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-enterprise/commit/022473e983635f1cfe06dd4261… Can you paste the value for the xwiki.rendering.syntaxes setting from your xwiki.cfg? Do the XWiki 2.0 and 2.1 syntaxes appear in the syntax list in the Document Information panel? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/