hel-o wrote: Visit /xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Migration using an administrator account.

Thanks, worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i understand the new blog application uses the new syntax. Tried to change the syntax for the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros macro -> macro didn't work. Tried to link to the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages picture (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work. Know Bugs or did i do something wrong?

hel. Sergiu Dumitriu-2 wrote: > > hel-o wrote: >> Hi, >> >> how can i migrate existing blog posts to the new blog application? > > Visit /xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Migration using an administrator account. >

hel-o wrote: That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The new one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki.

I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in its quite stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks functionality the old one had.

But back to my Blog problem: http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/ flickrusertag Macro didn't work after update. When i use the velocity code the result is an error The image link and the {{velocity}} things show that no new syntax is used:wistle: Using the Macro on a normal Page works http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ So it seems no code can be used in the new Blog application

vmassol wrote: > > > On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> hel-o wrote: >>> Thanks, >>> >>> worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i >>> understand >>> the new blog application >>> uses the new syntax. >>> >>> Tried to change the syntax for the >>> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros >>> macro -> >>> macro didn't work. >>> >>> Tried to link to the >>> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages >>> picture >>> (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work. >>> >>> Know Bugs or did i do something wrong? >>> >> >> That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The >> new >> one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki. > > I wouldn't quite say that in 1.8RC1. It's quite stable IMO and we do > need people to use it to know the area that we still need to improve > (the new rendering core is quite stable, probably way more than the > old syntax but there are some integration parts that we probably > still > need to work on). > > And it can be set on a page by page basis so you don't have to commit > your full wiki to use it. > > Thanks > -Vincent > http://xwiki.com > http://xwiki.org > http://massol.net

Hi, On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote: Which features are you looking for that are lacking? Yes there seems to be some issues mixing the blog app written in 1.0 syntax with blog pages written in 2.0 syntax. I'll look into it to understand the problem.

> vmassol wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> hel-o wrote: >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i >>>> understand >>>> the new blog application >>>> uses the new syntax. >>>> >>>> Tried to change the syntax for the >>>> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros >>>> macro -> >>>> macro didn't work. >>>> >>>> Tried to link to the >>>> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages >>>> picture >>>> (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work. >>>> >>>> Know Bugs or did i do something wrong? >>>> >>> >>> That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The >>> new >>> one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki. >> >> I wouldn't quite say that in 1.8RC1. It's quite stable IMO and we do >> need people to use it to know the area that we still need to improve >> (the new rendering core is quite stable, probably way more than the >> old syntax but there are some integration parts that we probably >> still >> need to work on). >> >> And it can be set on a page by page basis so you don't have to >> commit >> your full wiki to use it. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> http://xwiki.com >> http://xwiki.org >> http://massol.net

Hi, On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote: Which features are you looking for that are lacking?

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: One problem is in our xwiki syntax 1.0 to 2.0 converter. What happens is that when you convert a blog page into 2.0 syntax it calls Blog.BlogPostSheet which is in xwiki 1.0 syntax so the new include macro will automatically try to convert it to 2.0 syntax and there seems to be some problem. Raised as comments in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3107

The second problem is on the blog WebHome page (which is syntax 1.0). Since some blog pages are in syntax 2.0 their content are rendered in syntax 2.0 but the syntax 1.0 page cannot display 2.0 content.... I'm not sure yet how to solve this one...

ok. We're currently working on implementing the new dialog boxes (the ones currently in were done roughly while waiting for the new ones). If you're interested here are the mockups for the new dialog boxes: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterface Thanks -Vincent