14 Dec
2010
14 Dec
'10
11:06 a.m.
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the
XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
14 Dec
14 Dec
12:24 p.m.
Hi Vincent,
Of course, you MUST drop the IE6 support.
+1
Maxime
2010/12/14 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6
in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of
extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point
in time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support
for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there
(including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
12:29 p.m.
Hi,
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in
the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
No problem at all for us either! +1 to drop support for IE6 if this
helps to improve other areas!
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
4:22 p.m.
+1 as a user
+100 as a developer ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)xwiki.org [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of Vincent
Massol
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:06 PM
To: XWiki Users
Subject: [xwiki-users] Dropping support for IE6?
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the
XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
10:43 p.m.
+1 personally
-10 for other users: in my company XP stills standard OS and IE6
standard browser but 2011 could be new start
2010/12/14 Roman Muntyanu <rmuntyan(a)softserveinc.com>om>:
+1 as a user
+100 as a developer ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)xwiki.org [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of Vincent
Massol
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:06 PM
To: XWiki Users
Subject: [xwiki-users] Dropping support for IE6?
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in
the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
10:59 p.m.
As a user: +1
For my customers, some of whom are government agencies, IE 6 still seems to be
relevant and they are often not in control of their own environment (e.g. can't
install Firefox themselves for example, or IT dept won't let them.)
bye,
Menso
On 14 dec 2010, at 11:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in
the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Met vriendelijke groet/With kind regards,
Menso Heus
Gendo B.V.
Main: +31 20 891 0330
Cell: +31 639574833
menso(a)gendo.nl
site: www.gendo.nl
Gendo BV
Wibautstraat 150, 1091 GR Amsterdam
The Netherlands
P please consider the environment before printing this email
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its attachments are subject to the disclaimer published at the
following website of Gendo: http://www.gendo.nl/disclaimer
Gendo B.V. is registered with the trade register in The Netherlands under number
28116864.
15 Dec
15 Dec
1:27 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p>
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with a macro, to be called externally as a
web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
1:21 p.m.
+1
:-) Tim
On 14 Dec 2010, at 10:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in
the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra
development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time,
I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been
dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
2:01 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p>
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with a
macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
4:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p/>
Vincent,
Thanks for replying.
Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the
content enclosed in <p/><p/>
(I am running 2.6.33065)
Regards,
Tim
On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with
a macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
9:42 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p>
Another way is to use "get" action instead of "view".
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 14:01, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with
a macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
9:46 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p/>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 16:17, Tim Jones <tim.jones.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Vincent,
Thanks for replying.
Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the
content enclosed in <p/><p/>
It's working very well for me as you can see in
http://tuska.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Test/Plain?xpage=plain&outputSy…
The <p> is probably generated some way by your content or maybe you
are using xwiki/1.0 syntax for which outputSyntax parameter is not
supported.
(I am running 2.6.33065)
Regards,
Tim
On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with
a macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
16 Dec
16 Dec
9:06 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p>
And an other way again will be to specify specify content type.
Personally, with XE 2.6, I return an xml document with view action,
xpage=plain and $response.setContentType('application/xml')
Arnaud.
2010/12/15 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
Another way is to use "get" action instead
of "view".
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 14:01, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with
a macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
9:08 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] xpage=plain encloses output in <p/>
Other way again will be to specify specify content type.
Personally, with XE 2.6, I return an xml document with view action,
xpage=plain and $response.setContentType('application/xml')
Arnaud.
2010/12/15 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 16:17, Tim Jones
<tim.jones.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Vincent,
Thanks for replying.
Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the
content enclosed in <p/><p/>
It's working very well for me as you can see in
http://tuska.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Test/Plain?xpage=plain&outputSy…
The <p> is probably generated some way by your content or maybe you
are using xwiki/1.0 syntax for which outputSyntax parameter is not
supported.
(I am running 2.6.33065)
Regards,
Tim
On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Tim,
try:
xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I would like to return pure JSON from a page with
a macro, to be called externally as a web service.
When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is
still enclosed within <p> </p>.
Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?
Regards,
Tim
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
10 Feb
10 Feb
12:04 p.m.
More opinions on this topic would help.
+1 for dropping from a developer perspective
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 14:21, Tim Jones <tim.jones.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
:-) Tim
On 14 Dec 2010, at 10:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi everyone,
As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for
IE6 in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?
The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of
extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.
Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this
point in
time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since
support for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there
(including Microsoft).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
5064
days inactive
5122
days old
14 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Arnaud bourree -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Le Génie -
Menso Heus -
Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] -
Roman Muntyanu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Tim Jones -
Vincent Massol