Hi, Yes you’re right. We’ve developed the XWiki syntax to be the most complete syntax and so that it works well with WYSIWYG, i.e. that it’s easy to convert from/to (X)HTML. I’d recommend that you user the XWiki syntax if you can (XWiki Syntax 2.1 to be precise). Yes that’s possible, see http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/MediaWiki/MediaWiki+XM… You can also convert page by page, see http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/PageEditing#HChoosingaSyn… and http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/PageEditing#HConvertingbe… Thanks -Vincent [snip]

Yes sorry, my bad, I read too quickly and thought you were asking to convert *from* mediawiki. As Thomas said, we don’t have any easy way to convert back to MediaWiki syntax. Thanks -Vincent

To be complete, it depends on the syntax. For some syntaxes we have implemented “serializers” (we call them Renderers), i.e. the ability to transform from an XWiki AST into an output syntax. The information is available here: http://rendering.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HSupportedSyntaxes In the table, whenever you see “output syntax” as ticked, it means XWiki can convert to that syntax from all other syntaxes. For example you can convert from, say, MediaWiki syntax to, say, XHTML 1.0. Or from Confluence syntax to Markdown syntax. It also means that when “output syntax” is ticked, it’s possible to use the WYSIWYG editor for that syntax. However there can be limitations, depending on what the syntax supports (there may be some HTML elements not supported by the syntax for example, in which case they’d be ignored). Thanks -Vincent