Hi Ricardo, We had a really interesting chat at the office about whether XWiki as a company originated the "Second Generation Wiki" term. Looking back into Google and previous versions of XWiki websites, the earlier mention of a Second Generation Wiki we found was here: http://old.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Dev/XTech2005Presentation , dating from May 2005. When we started googling the term we found that of around 7,500 pages mentioning the term ( http://www.google.com/search?q=%22second+generation+wiki%22 ) , only 219 did not mention XWiki ( http://www.google.com/search?q=%22second+generation+wiki%22-XWiki ). This shows a real strong correlation between XWiki and the Second Generation Wiki term. Google itself isn't faultless since it returns some pages even when XWiki is explicitely excluded from the search query (this one for instance : http://weblog.infoworld.com/tcdaily/archives/2007/01/groovy_language.html ). Some of the other websites returned sound a lot like they are using XWiki without mentioning its name (check this page for instance : http://www.xcellor.com/services/wikis.html ). So all this data seems to indicate that XWiki as a company originated the term and remains its almost unique user to this day. However it is interesting to note that the term "Application Wiki" can and has been used by us as a synonym of Second Generation Wiki. Upon creating XWiki Ludovic drew part of its inspiration from TWiki that offered (and still do) some - limited - application creation possibilities. The fact that they were limited was in fact the main reason why the work on XWiki was started, back in January 2004. At around the same time in 2004 was created JotSpot, that marketed itself as the first Application Wiki. JotSpot offers bundled applications when you download it as well as a directory of applications you can add to your wiki. Though obvisously applications for JotSpot can be created, I do not know what kind of mechanism they are created through and whether it is similar to XWiki's own system of class, objects & templates. JotSpot is not an Open-Source solution and it was bought by Google back in 2006. It is supposedly scheduled to come out as the new Google Sites at wome point in the future, but it is not clear whether options others than ASP will be offered, nor how application creation will be handled. The current disparition of JotSpot leaves XWiki as the only wiki built around the core notion of application creation combined with scripting abilities. However a lot more results are returned by Google for this term, and XWiki is part of around 10% of them (5,000 mentions of JotSpot for 1,700 mentions of XWiki out of 14,700 pages mentioning the term). It is likely that the term is used in more situations & contexts than the more specific "Second Generation wiki". Now there could be a debate on whether "Application Wiki" & "Second Generation Wiki" do mean the same thing. My position would be that being a Second Generation wiki encompasses the fact of being an Application Wiki, at least in the case of XWiki. XWiki was built to answer a general use case : letting people make effective use of a wiki within their company. This could be broken down in a number of subsets, including (but not limited to): advanced user rights, application creation possibilities, scripting abilities, wide database support, rich text editor... XWiki meets some of these requirements very well (think about application creation) while it has room for improvements in others (think about the WYSIWYG editor). In some ways second generation wiki then means "built for industrial use" as opposed to "built to explore the possibilities of the wiki concept" (which would be what first generation wikis do) - though one would be right to reply that MediaWiki, TWiki, DekiWiki or Confluence are built for industrial use too. Here industrial use is not understood the same way, that is, those wikis are not natively built to be integrated with other applications through database connexions with data feeds handled through scripts and application creation possibilities... I'm getting lengthy, therefore stopping myself here. Hope this answered some of your questions though :-) Wishing you all fellow XWikiers a happy new year, Guillaume On 27/12/2007, Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez <webmaster(a)xen.net> wrote: -- http://wikibc.blogspot.com/

Ricardo Rodriguez wrote: a a a history! Unfortunately, while interesting, the bulk of the information in Guillaume's post would be considered Original Research (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OR), which is not welcome to Wikipedia. Content on WP is ideally from secondary sources. So if this information exists in good independent sources, it can be sited and used, but you can't say things like "according to a Google search". The WP page for XWiki appropriately describes it as an Application Wiki. If an independent source can be found that says XWiki coined the term "second generation wiki", then it would be appropriate, and probably a good idea to mention it there. If xwiki.org has a page defining the term "second generation wiki", it might be nice to add this information there. Or maybe have a history article on xwiki.org. -Paul D. Grodt