16 Jan
2008
16 Jan
'08
11 p.m.
Hello,
searching for mod_jk wasn't very rich on xwiki.org.
I am convinced may are using an apache httpd in front of the jetty or
tomcat hosting xwiki. Now the question comes as to whether some
static paths are or should be configured.
Currently we have none, on the back of mod_proxy, and I seem to see,
e.g., the logo, that gets downloaded everytime which is big big non-
sense.
I understand all request to skins, yui, freemind, s5, tiny_mce,
wiki_editor, xwiki.js, and yui could be directed to static requests
(since server inclusions such as velocity files are read from the
server anyways and the rest is static).
Is that correct ?
Is there any velocity within javascript ? And if yes where?
thanks in advance
paul
16 Jan
16 Jan
11:05 p.m.
On Jan 16, 2008 5:00 PM, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)activemath.org> wrote:
Hello,
searching for mod_jk wasn't very rich on xwiki.org.
Hi
Not that I would have any clue, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_jk
http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2006/02/01/mod_jk_is_dead_long_live_mod_proxy_…
Sorry if this does not help at all...
Cheers
17 Jan
17 Jan
5:47 p.m.
I'm sorry but I really meant to ask for documentation on how to
configure mod_jk or mod_proxy *with xwiki*.
In particular, I wanted to proof the path to the static elements.
I do not know how to check "if there's some velocity" in Javascript
files, for example (grep for '#' ? is enough?).
paul
Le 16 janv. 08 à 23:05, justanotheradress(a)gmail.com a écrit :
On Jan 16, 2008 5:00 PM, Paul Libbrecht
<paul(a)activemath.org> wrote:
Hello,
searching for mod_jk wasn't very rich on xwiki.org.
Hi
Not that I would have any clue, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_jk
http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2006/02/01/
mod_jk_is_dead_long_live_mod_proxy_ajp.html
Sorry if this does not help at all...
6:34 p.m.
AFAIK, xwiki .js files aren't parsed by the velocity renderer. You might
find JS mixed with velocity only in templates inside <script> tags.
Regards,
Jérôme.
I'm sorry but I really meant to ask for
documentation on how to
configure mod_jk or mod_proxy *with xwiki*.
In particular, I wanted to proof the path to the static elements.
I do not know how to check "if there's some velocity" in Javascript
files, for example (grep for '#' ? is enough?).
paul
Le 16 janv. 08 à 23:05, justanotheradress(a)gmail.com a écrit :
On Jan 16, 2008 5:00 PM, Paul Libbrecht
<paul(a)activemath.org> wrote:
Hello,
searching for mod_jk wasn't very rich on xwiki.org.
Hi
Not that I would have any clue, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_jk
http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2006/02/01/
mod_jk_is_dead_long_live_mod_proxy_ajp.html
Sorry if this does not help at all...
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
6:30 p.m.
Hello,
Paul Libbrecht wrote on 17/01/2008 17:47:
I'm sorry but I really meant to ask for
documentation on how to
configure mod_jk or mod_proxy *with xwiki*.
There is no specific configuration for
xwiki.
xwiki need a Java servlet container like Tomcat or Jetty.
If you want to put Apache httpd in front of to made a reverse proxy on
your server, then you need mod_proxy and mod_proxy_html
In particular, I wanted to proof the path to the static elements.
I do not know how to check "if there's some velocity" in Javascript
files, for example (grep for '#' ? is enough?).
There is no velocity in
Javascript send to browser, velocity runs only
on server side
paul
Le 16 janv. 08 à 23:05, justanotheradress(a)gmail.com
<mailto:justanotheradress@gmail.com> a écrit :
On Jan 16, 2008 5:00 PM, Paul Libbrecht
<paul(a)activemath.org
<mailto:paul@activemath.org>> wrote:
Hello,
searching for mod_jk wasn't very rich on xwiki.org
<http://xwiki.org>.
Hi
Not that I would have any clue, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_jk
http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2006/02/01/mod_jk_is_dead_long_live_mod_proxy_…
<http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2006/02/01/mod_jk_is_dead_long_live_mod_proxy_ajp.html>
Sorry if this does not help at all...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
18 Jan
18 Jan
12:27 a.m.
Jerome Velociter wrote:
AFAIK, xwiki .js files aren't parsed by the
velocity renderer. You might
find JS mixed with velocity only in templates inside <script> tags.
Not exactly, some of the JS files are parsed (those that get through the
SkinAction). But I don't think that is an issue, they can be cached.
AFAIR, there is no (outer) script that really depends on the current
request.
Sergiu
12:57 a.m.
Le 18 janv. 08 à 00:27, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
Jerome Velociter wrote:
> AFAIK, xwiki .js files aren't parsed by the velocity renderer. You
> might find JS mixed with velocity only in templates inside
> <script> tags.
That's how much I could see with less and grep in albatross and would
be already very relevant.
Not exactly, some of the JS files are parsed (those
that get
through the SkinAction).
These are the ones I would like to know about.
But I don't think that is an issue, they can be
cached.
It is an issue.
In mod_jk, it is classical to configure the "static" resources to be
fully ignored by the servlet container... no caching, just normal
apache httpd download work (with file modifs headers, only-if-changed-
since responses etc).
Caching is an alternative for performance management, and it relies
on the proper usage of Vary headers... report on experience there is
interesting as well.
AFAIR, there is no (outer) script that really depends
on the
current request.
Then for performance that script should be kind of isolated.
In an ideal solution, all that would be under xwiki/static and it'd
be easy to take part into httpd (which may well be on another host).
Right now, I think that xwiki/skins would already be a good first step.
If Have an answer to question 1 (or a way to track the answer on
individual files, I think I could let experiments be made...
paul
9:42 a.m.
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 18 janv. 08 à 00:27, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
How about:
- scripts that are taken from /xwiki/skins/albatross/*js are static
= scripts that are taken from /xwiki/bin/skin/.../*js are parsed
Sergiu
Jerome Velociter wrote:
> AFAIK, xwiki .js files aren't parsed by the velocity renderer. You
> might find JS mixed with velocity only in templates inside <script>
> tags.
That's how much I could see with less and grep in albatross and would be
already very relevant.
Not exactly, some of the JS files are parsed
(those that get through
the SkinAction).
These are the ones I would like to know about.
But I don't think that is an issue, they can
be cached.
It is an issue.
In mod_jk, it is classical to configure the "static" resources to be
fully ignored by the servlet container... no caching, just normal apache
httpd download work (with file modifs headers, only-if-changed-since
responses etc).
Caching is an alternative for performance management, and it relies on
the proper usage of Vary headers... report on experience there is
interesting as well.
AFAIR, there is no (outer) script that really
depends on the current
request.
Then for performance that script should be kind of isolated.
In an ideal solution, all that would be under xwiki/static and it'd be
easy to take part into httpd (which may well be on another host). Right
now, I think that xwiki/skins would already be a good first step.
If Have an answer to question 1 (or a way to track the answer on
individual files, I think I could let experiments be made...
6140
days inactive
6142
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Arnaud BOURREE -
Jerome Velociter -
justanotheradress＠gmail.com -
Paul Libbrecht -
Sergiu Dumitriu