Sorry ! I just replied without checking in gmail ! I hope this one
goes to the right place !
On 4/15/05, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
>
> Luis,
>
> It's time to move to the new list !
>
> http://forge.objectweb.org/mail/?group_id=170
>
> Ludovic
>
> Luis Arias a écrit :
>
> >Ok that sounds great ! I will try that this morning. Thank you
> >Vincent. I'm not ready to commit anything yet but I would like ssh
> >access. I signed up as kaaloo(a)gmail.com on ObjectWeb.
> >
> >P.S. I have some questions about using MockObjects in my LifeblogTest.
> > The problem being that it seems to me that most existing tests go
> >through cactus and require a container. So I'm getting null pointers
> >and stuff because the XWiki object is not set up right. So per your
> >suggestion I'm going to try to do this through jmock and mockobjects
> >(I need both right ?). I didn't see jdk5 jars in the mockobjects tar
> >file so I suppose I should use the 1.4 j2ee 1.3 ones.
> >
> >I'm going through the doc and I'll post some detailed questions later
> >on if I need too.
> >
> >Luis.
> >
> >On 4/14/05, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Luis,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: developers-bounces(a)xwiki.org [mailto:developers-bounces@xwiki.org]
> >>>On Behalf Of Luis Arias
> >>>Sent: jeudi 14 avril 2005 19:17
> >>>To: XWiki.org Developers Mailing List
> >>>Subject: Re: Subversion migration done
> >>>
> >>>Hi Vincent,
> >>>
> >>>Very cool, after a bit of fumbling I updated the wiki and there does
> >>>not seem to be anymore trace of erroneous CVS instructions. How can I
> >>>handle my diffs ? Just checkout directly on top of my existing CVS
> >>>tree ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Here's a very simple way:
> >>- You check out from the new repo using svn+ssh.
> >>- You delete all the CVS directory from your old CVS tree on your machine
> >>- You copy the old directory structure over the new one that you've just
> >>checked out
> >>- You commit. As SVN works by sending diffs only the differences will be
> >>committed.
> >>
> >>There are probably other ways but I've used this one successfully in the
> >>past.
> >>
> >>-Vincent
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On 4/13/05, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>>The SVN migration has been done. All XWiki source code is now in
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Subversion.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>All information about accessing the new repository is available on
> >>>>http://forge.objectweb.org/plugins/scmsvn/index.php?group_id=170.
> >>>>
> >>>>Note that the instructions says to use
> >>>>svn://svn.forge.objectweb.org/svnroot/xwiki. This is not quite correct.
> >>>>Using this will check out not only the SVN trunk (the equivalent of CVS
> >>>>HEAD) but also all the tags and branches. To get only the trunk, use the
> >>>>svn://svn.forge.objectweb.org/svnroot/xwiki/trunk URL.
> >>>>
> >>>>You'll now need to use a Subversion client to check out the source code.
> >>>>
> >>>>Some clients that I have been using successfully in the past (on
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>windows):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>- TortoiseSVN
> >>>>- command line svn (works on both windows and unix)
> >>>>- Subclipse for Eclipse
> >>>>- Intellij's IDEA (EAP version has SVN support built in)
> >>>>
> >>>>Note: If you're a developer and want to use the svn+ssh protocol it's a
> >>>>little bit more tricky. I've found TortoiseSVN to work very fine. If
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>you're
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>using subclipse you'll need to read
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>http://www.tmate.org/svn/subclipse.html.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>If you're using IntelliJ you should search for "svn+ssh" in the forums
> >>>>(you'll see some of my posts explaining how to do it).
> >>>>
> >>>>For a good free book on Subversion, see http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>Ludovic, you can turn off the old CVS repo. We also need to update the
> >>>>instructions on the wiki.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks
> >>>>-Vincent
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Developers mailing list
> >>>>Developers(a)xwiki.org
> >>>>http://www.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>Luis Arias
> >>>http://www.xwiki.com
> >>>http://www.innover-entreprendre.net
> >>>+33 6 14 20 87 93 mobile
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Developers mailing list
> >>>Developers(a)xwiki.org
> >>>http://www.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Developers mailing list
> >>Developers(a)xwiki.org
> >>http://www.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ludovic Dubost
> XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
> Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
> XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
> Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
>
>
--
Luis Arias
http://www.xwiki.comhttp://www.innover-entreprendre.net
+33 6 14 20 87 93 mobile
Hi everyone,
If you're a current committer on Sourceforge you'll need to register on
objectweb so that we can give you commit rights.
Let Ludovic or myself know about it and we'll add you as committer on
GForge.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi All,
I have a question about ObjectWeb IDs when downloading from svn.
To download nightly versions of xwiki files, will be necessary to
identify as Objectweb users by ID instead of anonymous, like it was
with sourceforge?
Thanks,
Danielo
Hi everybody,
Mine is +1. It looks better organize.
Danielo.
Vincent Massol wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>The current directory structure in SVN is:
>
>[REPOROOT]/
> |_ trunk/
> |_ xwiki/
> |_ branches/
> |_ [branchname]
> |_ xwiki/
> |_ tags/
> |_ [tagname]
> |_ xwiki/
>
>Where REPOROOT = svn[+ssh]://svn.forge.objectweb.org/svnroot/xwiki
>
>This is not right. I'd like to transform it into:
>
>[REPOROOT]/
> |_ xwiki/
> |_ trunk/
> |_ branches/
> |_ [branchname]
> |_ tags/
> |_ [tagname]
>
>And then if we want want to add a xwiki-plugins project later on we would
>have:
>
>[REPOROOT]/
> |_ xwiki/
> |_ trunk/
> |_ branches/
> |_ tags/
> |_ xwiki-plugins/
> |_ trunk/
> |_ branches/
> |_ tags/
>
>This follows the standard SVN directory structure defined in
>http://tinyurl.com/4dhja.
>
>One reason is that the release lifecycle of xwiki/ and xwiki-plugins/ will
>probably be different (you can release a newer version of a plugin even if
>the core is not released again).
>
>XWiki committers, Please cast your vote:
>
>[] +1, I agree
>[] 0, I don't have any opinion
>[] -1, I don't agree. State your reason
>
>Here's my +1
>
>Thanks
>-Vincent
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Developers mailing list
>Developers(a)xwiki.org
>http://www.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
>
Welcome everyone to this new list @ Objectweb.
-Vincent
_________________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en fran�ais !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
