Hi,
We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on
different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example).
There is also an issue referring to this problem
XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to
find an answer in order to move forward consistency.
So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document" ?
I'm voting +1 for "Page".
"Page" is more used IMO, especially in the "Space"/"Page" context.
"Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a platform that
encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents).
Please cast your vote.
Thanks,
Caty
Hi,
Im trying to fix http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4274
Basically if you do $xwiki.getDocument("someDoc").getRenderedContent()
it'll get executed in the context of the current doc which I believe
is wrong especially since other signatures of getRenderedContent()
execute in the target document's context.
I have fixed this locally but found that admin.vm for example is
assuming that getRenderedContent() will get executed in the context of
the calling doc (i.e. XWiki.Import when doing an import for example).
FYI the chain flow is admin.vm -- getRenderedContent() -->
XWiki.AdminSheet --> XWiki.AdminImportSheet --> importinline.vm, which
requires the current doc to be XWiki.Import (to get/put attachments
from/to it).
I can fix this easily using a new getRenderedContent signature I've
introduced.
However I'm wondering if we have other places that incorrectly use
getRenderedContent() and assume it won't be rendered in the context of
the target document.
Is this change too dangerous to make? If not know, we'll need to it
quickly (2.1M1?) since it's an important bug IMO.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
Could be useful:
http://ocpsoft.com/prettytime/
Idea of usage: For ex we could use that to show the last modified
document dates for dates in the past week (for ex):
"Document created 2 days ago"
It's in the maven central repo and it's under LGPL
-Vincent
Hi Everyone!
I have read this document "Writing GWT applications in XWiki" (
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WritingGWTApplicationsInXWiki)
And I know how to develop GWT module for xwiki now. I also have read the
document "WYSIWYG Editor Module" (
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Modules/WysiwygEditorModule). I
followed the instruction which tried to integrate the WYSIWYG editor(GWT
application) in wiki pages, and I put the following code in my wiki editor:
"{{html}}
<script type="text/javascript" src="XWikiWysiwyg.js"> alert('WYSIWYG code is
loaded!'); </script> <textarea id="demo"></textarea> <script
type="text/javascript"> Wysiwyg.onModuleLoad(function() { new
WysiwygEditor({hookId:'demo'}); alert('WYSIWYG code is loaded!'); });
Wysiwyg.onModuleLoad(function() { editor = new WysiwygEditor({hookId:
'demo'}); }); }); </script> {{/html}}"
After saved, it only display a blank text area without any sign of WYSIWYG
editor, also there is no alart 'WYSIWYG code is loaded!' popup. Can you help
me figure it out what is wrong with it?
I am planing to develop a tree view using GWT to display Design Rationale
Element. Could you give me some ideas of after my development, how can I
embeded the GWT application into Xwiki pages and interact with the GWT
application?
Thank you very much!
Leon
Hi,
I remember once there was a contest for new XWiki logo but due to
elections fail (there would have been too many unsatisfied people if any of
newly suggested logos had been approved) the process has gracefully ended
(which, in my opinion, was a good decision)
I also think that it would be worthless to conduct another
competition/election amongst users because as the saying goes - tastes
differ. The only thing users can contribute are their ideas (which might be
accepted or might not which is fair) regarding shapes and symbols to use.
Decision about visual design should be made within very very small circle of
visual designers probably with one or two people involved in the project to
chill down designers' burning imagination :)
Having all of the above said, I would suggest to collect a set of shapes
and symbols for new XWiki logo each supplied with description of underlying
meaning. And then (having revised all of the comments in some of the former
posts regarding what new logo should be: symmetric/asymmetric,
complex/simple, round/firm) provide all that to a designer to draw several
sketches. And then by internal vote (at maximum the development team members
involved) choose the new logo.
This thread is for storing all of the ideas on the new XWiki logo. At
least that's what I (as a user) will be using it for may any ideas to come.
Join :)
Regards,
Roman
--
View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-logo-around-tp6074956p6074956.html
Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi (especially Sergiu),
I think you worked on removing the dependency on Albatross, right?
Is it finished? Can can we move the Albatross skin to contrib/retried?
See http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/jx5vyqtrwwaidfka
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi,
In order to get more community help and to open up our xwiki.org infrastructure to the community we could introduce an infra(a)xwiki.org mailing list which would be the place to:
- talk about infrastructure. By infra I mean machines and their configuration + xwiki.org + myxwiki.org
- receive emails from xwiki.org and myxwiki.org when XE/XEM restarts (there's a script to restart them automatically when an instance doesn't respond within 30 seconds for ex). These emails contains thread dump + other information useful to debug and understand why the instance wasn't responding.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi Devs,
I'd like to introduce a new configuration property that would define
at which level users should be handled in a farm.
See the proposition about the new entry in xwiki.properties, it should
be self-explanatory:
--------------------------------8<--------------------------------
#-# [Since 2.5M1]
#-# Define at which level users and groups should be handled in the
farm. Available modes:
#-#
#-# mixed (default):
#-# - user registration available in the main wiki and local wikis
#-# - users from the current wiki and the main wiki will be displayed
in the rights interface and user suggests
#-# - user administration is present in all the wikis
#-#
#-# local:
#-# - user registration available in the main wiki and local wikis
#-# - only users from the current wiki will be displayed in the rights
interface and user suggests
#-# - user administration is present in all the wikis
#-#
#-# global:
#-# - user registration available in the main wiki only, the register
link in local wikis will point to the main wiki
#-# - only users from the main wiki will be displayed in the rights
interface and user suggests
#-# - user administration is present in the main wiki only
core.virtual.users=mixed
-------------------------------->8--------------------------------
More details are available here:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/UsersModule
WDYT ?
Thanks,
JV.