10 Feb
2016
10 Feb
'16
3:01 p.m.
+1 to provide this template on contrib.xwiki.org as a best practice
for those who want to use it but not a big fan of making it a rule
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau
<guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for the first proposal. Having informations in the
github repo is more
friendly.
2016-02-10 14:53 GMT+01:00 vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Alex,
On 10 Feb 2016 at 14:43:53, Alexandru Cotiuga (alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com
(mailto:alexandru.cotiuga@xwiki.com)) wrote:
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs + 1
I would also propose to add the Java version needed for release (instead
of
digging in the hierarchy to find out this
information)
I don’t agree. I think we should only put the minimal number of
information as it’s very tedious to ensure that the info is in sync. Right
now I’ve put only what I think is the minimal info. Also the Java version
is checked during the build so you cannot have it wrong.
OTOH I see there’s a link to Translations on l10n. I think that’s a good
idea for apps that support internationalization. Would be optional.
and maybe there are
some other particular steps to follow when a release is performed.
The template is about the minimal that need to be displayed. We should
mention that of course each repo should add whatever information it
needs/wants to that README.
A good
example would be:
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager/blob/master/README…
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs