RE: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 309 : Bold codification is not the same than in wiki editor mode

I also have an issue with having different ways of doing the same thing. I think this is really bad for our users. For bold, I'd go for the *text* syntax (because that's the syntax I've seen used in most other wikis I've used) and deprecate the _text_ syntax. However I've not been here for long and I don't know the history around this so I'd rather defer to Ludovic or other old-timers to decide on this. Also, in order not to break any compatibility we need to continue to support the _text_ syntax. So I'd be to have both the xwiki editor and the WYSIWYG editor generate *text* syntax but they should continue to support the _text_ syntax. We'd also need to fix the XWiki syntax sheet to reflect this. Alternatively we should have the wiki editor and the WYSIWYG one transform the _text_ syntax into *text* syntax when the user saves a document. I'm interested in getting other's opinions. Thanks -Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com