Hi guys,
Sorry for jumping in late on this one, but has I have probably already
mentioned in the issue, I really find inappropriate not to have a quickly
look on whether you are watching the current page or not (no matter if you
watch it directly or indirectly). So, IMO, the watch icon should show up
outside of the menu, and resume you watch state. It is both a action and a
state, and IMO it deserver a better place in the UI.
Obviously, if you add that the proposal 1.3, it gonna make a lot of menu,
and I would say too much.
Am I alone concerned by the important of pushing that watch feature in a
better place ?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Results for now:
1.1: -0 (me), -1 (Jean), -1 (Yacine)
1.2: +1 (me), -0 (Jean), +1 (Caty), +1 (Yacine)
1.3: 0 (me), +1 (Jean), +0 (Yacine), +1 (Guillaume Lerouge).
So 1.1 is out.
We still have 1.2 = 2 (me and Caty are the only binding votes) and 1.3 = 1
(Jean is only the binding vote).
It's a bit short to take a decision. Please vote!
2015-10-05 16:18 GMT+02:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
For the record, the users that don't have
delete and admin right on
the current document (i.e. the users that are neither administrators
nor the creator of the current document), which is the most common use
case I think, will have only the Copy entry in the Actions menu with
1.2. In other words, most of the users will see a menu with only one
entry.
Thanks,
Marius
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau
<gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is that
we
> have a too much crowded "more
actions" menu.
>
> Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue:
>
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587
>
> Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus:
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization
I'm in favor of the solution 1.2.
So:
* -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the most
(thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much
importance
* +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties
saying
> if an item is a base action or an advanced one.
>
> * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't have
an
> alternative to propose.
> * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created (
>
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would be
> opposed to this.
> * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, it
> implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have).
However, I
> remember a client using this feature for a
convoluted use-case:
include a
> light wiki page in an other website via an
iframe. Anyway, we could
still
keep the
viewer but remove the link.
* +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, but
it
disturbs me to let an access to the source code
of any wiki page,
including
not-well-done applications created by users.
Thanks,
Guillaume
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs