On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
This is not a priority (we need to finish our first stable release of
the WYSIWYG editor first) but I wanted to propose 2 things and start a
discussion on it:
* That we make our new GWT WYSIWYG editor a top level project (i.e.
with a separate jira, separate wiki like
http://wysiwyg.xwiki.org with
a better name, etc)
* Make it usable by someone who is not using XWiki
The rationale is:
* If we want our editor to become strong and compete with the likes of
FCKEditor/TinyMCE we need to open it up to others and for that we need
to:
- advertise it (hence the
http://wysiwyg.xwiki.org that would lists
all features same as
http://www.fckeditor.net/)
- make it be usable easily and thus without dragging xwiki dependencies
Other options:
1) Don't do anything. Cons: we won't get enough help and it'll be hard
to compete with other editors. They'll have more features/less bugs
and we'll have a hard time keeping up. In addition it's possible
someone else creates a new GWT WYSIWYG editor and it would be better
if we could all join force on that and using what we have started
2) Externalize it on some forge other than the xwiki forge. This is
nice from a marketing point of view (i.e. easier to show it as a pure
wysiwyg editor) but it has some drawbacks:
- further from the xwiki community and thus harder for us to maintain
it there
- doesn't strengthen our xwiki project
In addition, what we need to evaluate is how do we make it independent
of xwiki and how long would that take. This is probably more a
question for Marius. Marius this is not urgent compared to the 1.7.1
release. Whenever you have time.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
big +1, as Vincent said if we want it to be a strong WYSIWYG editor,
we need people to use it and contribute. And we would get a lot more
people and especially developers if make it standalone.
For the details I would be in favor of really externalize it as I
think it will get more people if it's clear it's a generic WYSIWYG
editor but yes it would not be seen as a XWiki strength anymore.
--
Thomas Mortagne