Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE][UI] WYSIWYG Wiki Explorer

I vote +1 for 4, and i don't consider 3 as a valid proposal

Le 28 nov. 08 à 08:31, Marius Dumitru Florea a écrit : > I'm not a big fan of step wizards thus I'm more into proposal 3. See > other comments below. > > Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Vincent Massol >> <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: >>> Re the image selection: >>> * It would be much much better to see the images before choosing >>> them >>> (the preview comes too late). You cannot choose an image on its >>> name >>> alone that's too hard. >> >> The only solution I see for this is to have a tooltip with a >> preview >> in the treeview. > > The user would be forced to use the mouse in order to see the > preview. > >> >>> * What is the camera icon doing? Is it just an image? >> >> Yes. >> >>> * How do I enter advanced parameters for images? >> >> This mockup is about the wiki explorer, I've put the example of the >> image insertion but this part is not to be taken as a proposal. >> >>> Apart from this it looks good to me but I still have a small >>> preference for 3 since >>> - as a user I prefer to see all options to understand where I'll >>> find >>> the feature I'm looking for >> >> s/user/power user/ > > The WYSIWYG addresses power users also. > >> >>> - it's one click less >> >> IMHO an extra click is only a problem if the user has to think >> where >> to click and why to click. >> I agree that 2 or more extra clicks are a problem but only one, >> with >> the action button always at the very same place, no. > > What I find sometimes annoying is going back and forth through a > wizard. > I admit a wizard fills more secure the first few times it's being > used, > but for me it can get annoying the more I'm using it. > > So I'm more into proposal 3, but I'm not against 4. > > Thanks, > Marius > >> >>> Re your arguments below we can have the same with option 3. >> >> I don't think so, actually that's why I came up with 4). >> >> JV.