On 11 Feb 2016 at 19:11:43, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Feb 2016 at 18:33:57, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:10 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi devs,
> >> >>
> >> >> Now that we’ve voted on the "XWiki Core” concept and that
we’ve agreed
> >> >> that the xwiki organization on github should focused on offering
core
> >> >> extensions only (and the rest should be moved to contrib) we need
to ensure
> >> >> that we use the same terminology everywhere.
> >> >>
> >> >> I’d like to start updating
xwiki.org accordingly but first I want
to be
> >> >> sure we agree on the terminology:
> >> >>
> >> >> * The "XWiki Runtime”: the XWiki WAR that you get from the
various
> >> >> distributions that you can find on
xwiki.org. It’s a minimalistic
runtime
> >> >> on top of which you can install Extensions. Documentation for it
will be
> >> >> available at
http://platform.xwiki.org.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > The doc for "XWiki Runtime" is available on
platform.xwiki.org (not on
> >> >
runtime.xwiki.org).... sounds a bit weird to me. Maybe we should create
an
> >> > alias for runtime, just in case?
> >> >
> >> > Also, the runtime is the result/artefact of building the platform,
right?
> >> > It`s what you actually get to install, as a user.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think I would prefer "XWiki Distribution" since that's what
it is
> >> after all: some distribution of XWiki and the only one we support.
> >> That's also the naming I started to use on
> >>
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/feature-platformdistribution/x…
> >> and I don't want to rename all that :).
> >
> > For me, the XWiki distributions is a different concept. There are various
distributions: WAR, ZIP, debian, EXE, etc.
> >
> > The XWiki Runtime is always included in the various distribution. However the
distributions can include other files (for example HSQLDB and Jetty for the ZIP
distribution).
> >
> > A distribution, as the name implies, is how you distribute something. It doesn’t
represent the runtime (which is included in the various distributions, along with other
things).
> >
>
> For me "distribution" has the same meaning than in Linux world: a
> arbitrary choice of stuff put together to make a produce you can use.
> It's also the meaning it has in the Distribution Wizard which is to
> setup the distribution you installed. WAR, ZIP, DEB, etc. are just
> packages of this distribution.
So we have 2 options:
* Option A:
** The "XWiki Runtime"
** "XWiki Distributions": the way the XWiki Runtime is distributed: zip
distribution, debian distribution, exe distribution, etc
** XWiki 7.4.1 <==> XWiki Runtime 7.4.1
* Option B:
** The "XWiki Distribution”
** "XWiki Packagings": the zip packaging, the debian packaging, the exe
packaging, etc
It’s probably because I’m not in the linux world
but option A seems less ambiguous to me. I hope that in option B when you say to someone
“download the xwiki distribution” that it’s understandable that it means they choose the
packaging they want and that they do not answer “which distribution?” (since there’s only
one, they shouldn’t ask this! ;)).
We only support one is not the same as there is only one. Anyone can
create other distributions of XWiki (based on this one most probably).