29 May
2018
29 May
'18
6:07 p.m.
On 29 May 2018, at 18:00, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:48 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I still don’t understand this. The only difference I see between mode images is the width
of the save bar.
My preference goes to not full width for the save bar, i.e. width of the editor only.
Hi Caty,
So if the window has space, the buttons should be placed normally (
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave/after10…).
The save buttons are placed in a fixed bottom bar, only if they get out of
the view port (
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave/after10…). On 29 May 2018, at 17:23, Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi devs,
Just to make sure we are on the same page since there were some
ambiguities
on the proposal, I've put some screenshot on
how it will look like:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
IdeaVisibleSave#HProposal10.x
Could you give some context to explain why we need a VOTE and what you’re
asking to VOTE about?
AFAIK there’s no need to VOTE on having Visible Save button since:
* We already discussed and decided to implement visible save
* It was already put twice in the roadmap and is currently in the 10.5
roadmap (which is already started), and nobody complained
So if your email is about bringing some variations to what was decided,
it’s fine but why does it need a VOTE? A simple proposal would have been
enough IMO.
This proposal extracts the save controls and puts
them on a fixed bottom
bar.
Does it mean that the vertical space for the editor is constrained and can
never be larger than the viewport minus the vertical space for the save bar?
Also on the http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
IdeaVisibleSave/after10.png screenshot the bar takes the full width but
on the followings screenshots the bar doesn’t. What is proposed precisely?
Inline mode is more problematic because it has panels
(looks a bit strange
to be full width, see
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave/after10…
). Ideally the buttons should be kept in the container they refer to, so in
xwiki content.
Yes I agree. Why is this a problem? Why not have the same width for the visible bar than
the container?
I made screenshots with how it would look on both
modes, but
depends on what we can actually implement. Don't have an ideal answer for
inline mode.
Why is
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave/after10… a
problem?
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
>
> Could you explain what’s different between "Proposal for 9.x" and
> "Proposal for 10.x" on http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
> IdeaVisibleSave#HProposal10.x
>
> I’ve checked quickly and I don’t see any difference visually.
>
>> There are some problems with the inline mode and with the responsive
>> versions.
>> With the inline version we could decide to keep the current
>> behavior and have the fixed bar only in Wiki and WYSIWYG modes. I guess
> we
>> should do some implementation tests and see what's possible.
>
> What problems?
>
> At this stage I can’t VOTE since I don’t know what’s the question and it
> seems to be missing some details (see my questions above).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> PS: It’s sad that we are so late on the design of visible save since we’ve
> had months to plan this. It was already put in a roadmap at least 6 months
> ago and then not finished and then put again in the roadmap several months
> ago. We could have had plenty of time to discuss/tune this. Now this means
> we are at risk of not finishing this for 10.5. Let’s hope we can catch up.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty