31 Jul
2008
31 Jul
'08
10:10 a.m.
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Well you should know since you coded it... :)
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Well, if we consider xeclipse as a plugin, yes xwiki-webdav is also a plugin
:) And i'm not clear what is meant by "More" ... hey, may be ludovic has a
better idea ? :)
Thanks.
- Asiri
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
My question was different... I'm talking in term of integration in the
platform. Where should it go in the source tree? Again, is it only a
plugin or more?
On Jul 30, 2008, at 7:37 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
[snip]
It's another way of exposing an xwiki repository ... > I think we should start having our plugin app
in Jira and have
> these as
> independent bug..
> I let you handle this with Vincent.
A committer should first review the code, verify its production
ready,
that it follows xwiki best practices in term of coding standards,
test
frameworks used, etc.
(as described on dev.xwiki.org).
At the same time we need to decide what structure the webdav feature
will have. Is it only a xwiki plugin? Is it more? Does it
need
modification to the core/platform?
Nope. None!
This is my view of xwiki-webdav, we better ask someone other than
myself to
comment on this :) > Once we decide where it could go in the main
svn we should start a
> vote to add it there.
>
> From that point forward we can create related jira project, release a
> first version, add the pages on xwiki.org, etc.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Great! looking forward to it. I'll be so happy to move xwiki-webdav
>> out of
>> sandbox... :P
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Asiri
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs