7 Mar
2012
7 Mar
'12
1:27 p.m.
Sergiu has some experience with this. Maybe he knows some best practices or
ways to preserve full history (including git renames).
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
I'm doing some experiment and here is another
issue: the common way to
isolate a subproject history is by using git filter-branch
--subdirectory-filter which isolate history based on the provided path
but this obviously is blocked by any modification on this path. In
practice it mean that no history older than the refactoring made when
we moved to git will be kept (and sometime even worst if other change
have been made).
Any other idea to isolate history ?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Since I plan to move some stuff from platform to commons I would like
to know what you think of the history in this case.
Pros including history:
* can access easily the whole history of a moved file. But sometimes
changing packages etc make too much difference for git to see it's
actually the same file so you loose it anyway.
Cons including history:
* double the history which make tools like ohloh indicate wrong
informations
* it's a lot easier to move without history
WDYT ?
Even if it was looking a bit weird to me at first I'm actually +1 to
not move the history in this case.
Eduard was proposing to include in the first commit of the new
repository the id of the last commit containing the files (basically
the id of the parent of the commit deleting the files) in the old
repository so that it's easier to find it. I'm +1 for this.
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs