Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Computed title depth configuration option

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:09, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: Sure, but not taking from XWikiPreference has big impact on farms. I have the same issue with the previous compat settings, I have to live with only one options for all my clients, which is obviously not easy to maintain. Yes, if you don't, I will anyway revive a thread about title. There is a major issue imposing title at the top of the document for at least 2 reasons: - site that have been built with the previous case are not always properly fixed by the current removal of doubles, since there may be editorial reason for a difference in the title texts - automated page suffer of this, since the content of the title may depends on a lot of script logic in the page, see ResetPasswordComplete for a simple XWiki exemple, and imagine what it does on more complex applicative site. So, yes, there is many improvement to put in for this. I am currently migrating sites from 1.9 to 2.2 and titles are my main issues. I had to use "display:none" style for some, waiting for something better ! Denis > > - do you allow 0 to disable searching title in content ? > I hadn't thought about this but yes, that should work fine actually (since > H0 doesn't exist) :) > Thanks > -VincentDenis > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:47, Asiri Rathnayake > > <asiri.rathnayake(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote: > > >> +1 > >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> >> wrote: > >> >>> Hi, > >>> >>> We've had a user request (Ludovic as a user ;)) to have a config option > >> to > >>> decide the header level to consider for a title. > >>> >>> Right now we consider only levels 1 and 2 when computing a title from > the > >>> doc content. > >>> >>> Thus I'm going to add a config option named xwiki.title.headerdepth and > >>> with a default value of 2 (to have the same behavior as now) and use it > >> in > >>> XWikiDocument.getRenderedContentTitle(). > >>> >>> Note that this is only for the 2.0 syntax (since it's too hard to do > for > >>> syntax 1.0 and we're not supposed to bring changes to the 1.0 syntax). > >>> >>> Please shout quickly if you're against this. > >>> >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> devs mailing list > >>> devs(a)xwiki.org > >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> devs(a)xwiki.org > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > > > -- > > Denis Gervalle > > SOFTEC sa - CEO > > eGuilde sarl - CTO > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO