28 May
2016
28 May
'16
3:02 p.m.
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't indicate
anything.
Hi devs,
This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there are some guidelines here:
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should be renamed
authenticator-android IMO.
It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
implementing Android authentication API, so very different from other
authenticator-* which are authenticator you install in XWiki.
>
> Regarding https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to decide what to do on 2
aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just serves as an examle for the generic
discussion):
>
> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub modules? Just use the
concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should be define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or
“other-oidc” or something else. I think just the concept name is ok. WDYT? >
> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and odic-provider. Should
this be named authenticator-odic and provider-odic instead to be in sync with
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename. I think so. WDYT?
I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
the ids of most of the platform modules...
See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne