On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I've sent a patch on the Jira for a first version of the new XMLRPC
layer.
(
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-1560)
Let me know if there are issues.
Hi XWikiers, Fabio,
I'm still working on your patch [1] in which you've written a
replacement of the swizzle library we're currently using. This
replacement is needed and has already been voted [2].
Even if the xwiki core will use it, this library is neither a part
of
it nor a new product so what do you think about creating a new
top-level module : xwiki-commons.
- xwiki-commons
-- xwiki-commons/xmlrpc/
I don't understand where you're suggesting to put "xwiki-commons" and
what it'll contain. Could you explain?
By top-level I mean at the top of our source tree, next to
xwiki-platform and xwiki-products.
I don't agree then, -1 from me. This definitely looks like something
that goes in the platform or I've missed something...
I have no idea what it means to have a directory at the same level as
platform and products. It would mean it's not platform related and
it's not a product either.
The only thing I propose to put in it (at least for
the moment) is the
swizzle replacement Fabio wrote, a standalone library containing both
xwiki xmlrpc model and client code (like swizzle).
I think I don't understand what you're proposing.
More specifically why do you want to introduce a xwiki-commons
directory?
Why not create:
xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-xmlrpc/
|_ xwiki-xmlrpc-model/
|_ xwiki-xmlrpc-client/
And then in the future when we move the server part it can go in xwiki-
xmlrpc-server/?
note: I assumed the model is used by both the client and the server
Thanks
-Vincent