10 Jul
2012
10 Jul
'12
9:14 a.m.
Hello friends,
For example a blog application could want to present a list of
<article>. But maybe nesting <article>
inside a main <article> element is
just fine.
For a blog homepage, or the blog archive, each
blog article should have its own <article>
wrapper, though.
Yes, I think Sergiu is right in that html5 allows for nesting of articles.
Thank you for the input.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Jonathan Solichin
<j.s.solichin(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> For example a blog application could want to present a list of
>> <article>. But maybe nesting <article> inside a main <article>
element is
>> just fine.
>
>
> For a blog homepage, or the blog archive, each
> blog article should have its own <article>
wrapper, though.
>
> Yes, I think Sergiu is right in that html5 allows for nesting of articles.
> Thank you for the input.
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Jonathan Solichin <jssolichin(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
>
>> Hi Jerome, friends,
>>
>> > * Would it make sense to use <aside> for the right sidebar ?
>>
>> The aside is actually only for the comments, attachments, history and
>> info sections of the sidebar only. The reason behind this is that according
>> to html5 specs:
>> >
>> > The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
>> content that is tangentially related to the content around the
>> asideelement, and which could be considered separate from that content.
>> Such sections are often represented as sidebars in printed typography. (
>> http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/)
>>
>> which I thought is appropriate for those sections.
>>
>> >
>> > * I've seen you've used <article> as an overall wrapper.
Wouldn't
>> <section>
>> > be more appropriate, with articles implemented within the content of
>> the
>> > document ? (BTW this leads to the question of how this would translate
>> in
>> > wiki syntax. So far there is no such notion built right in - though .it
>> > could be implemented with macros).
>>
>> The reason I used article as an overall wrapper for the "main content"
>> (the stuff with the white background), according to the html5 specs:
>> >
>> > "The article element represents a component of a page that consists of
>> a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and
>> that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in
>> syndication. This could be a forum post, a magazine or newspaper article, a
>> blog entry, a user-submitted comment, an interactive widget or gadget, or
>> any other independent item of content." (
>> http://html5doctor.com/the-article-element/)
>>
>> I thought this is appropriate since the entire "main content" is the
self
>> contained part of the page that can be independent of the other parts (like
>> menu, asides, sidebars etc.)
>> The use of section I thought is appropriate because each gadgets is in a
>> way a section/part of the overall article, and of the sidebar.
>> >
>> > "The section element represents a generic document or application
>> section" (http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/)
>>
>> These are just my thoughts on the components of a webpage of xwiki,
>> however. Do you think this is not the correct interpretation of the xwiki
>> parts?
>>
>> Thanks for looking into the code!
>> Jonathan Solichin
>>
>
>