+1
As someone (was Denis I think but can't find where anymore) suggested,
it would be nice to introduce some admin section to review and
enable/disable resource types (any extension can provide new resource
type).
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:20 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
During the discussions regarding
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XRENDERING-290 ("Add
support for linking to a user profile page in XWiki Syntax”) we hesitated adding a new
link type named “user:” because that would have broken backward compatibility for users
having a wiki named “user”.
See
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/vw3derowozijqalr and the ensuing
http://markmail.org/message/t2wb2xq7534qsshg
Now time has passed and we’ve just added the support for the “space” prefix for wiki
links, as in e.g. [[space:Space1.space]].
FYI, we’ve added the following in the release notes:
“
We've introduced the possibility to explicitly create a link to a Space in XWiki
Syntax 2.1, e.g. [[space:Space1.Space2]]. However if you had a subwiki named space the new
notation will conflict with the syntax for referencing that wiki. Thus you'll need to
edit existing links such as [[space:something]] to [[doc:space:something]]. And if you
wish to reference a given space in the space subwiki, you'd write
[[space:space:something]].
“
The rationale is that the resource reference syntax is not really tied to the wiki syntax
and we’re not going to increment the wiki syntax version each time we add a new type of
resource.
So with this VOTE I’d like to ensure that we’re ok to allow ourselves to continue adding
new resource reference types. For example we could add “user:” in the future without
having to go through a VOTE again. Whenever we do this, we would just need to mention it
in the release notes. Of course we shouldn’t add a prefix named “xwiki” ;)
Please cast your vote.
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs