Is that related to Office/OO import/Export?
Do you mean if you put math inside Word documents?
If you're talking about math support in general then that's not for
this thread... :) I also remember we discussed that several times
already too. Maybe you could start a new thread and explain what's
your need?
Thanks
-Vincent
Le 06-juin-08 à 00:34, Mirko Nasato a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'd certainly be happy to add XWiki to the list of other open source
> projects that use JODConverter and provide suggestions if needed.
>
> I see you mention xhtml... well the OOo xhtml filter is quite limited
> currently. For one it doesn't export embedded images[1]. But it's
> going to
> see big improvements with OOo 3.0.
>
> You may also be interested to know that there's a new major version
> of
> JODConverter[2] in development.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mirko
>
> --
> [1]
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22012
> [2]
http://jodconverter.wiki.sourceforge.net/v3.0
>
>
> 2008/6/5 Luis Arias <kaaloo(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
>> Cool ! I'm glad I could be of help ! Mirko will be happy to know
>> you are
>> working with his code. Putting him on copy.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Ludovic Dubost
>> <ludovic(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Luis,
>>>
>>> This is indeed exactly what we need.. a web service and a java
>>> API at
>>> the same time
>>> Wang you should use this.. expose it as an XWiki plugin with a
>>> configuration option to run embed or connect to an existing web
>>> service.
>>>
>>> My idea is that we ship XWiki configured by default to talk to a
>>> server
>>> that we would host on our platform.
>>>
>>> Ludovic
>>>
>>> Luis Arias wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to pop in, but I imagine you are aware of Mirko's
>>>> JODConverter and
>>>> JODReports:
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.artofsolving.com/
>>>>
>>>> If not I thought it might be useful in the context of your
>>>> discussion.
>>> His
>>>> code is used by Nuxeo, Alfresco, and others and is very simple
>>>> to use.
>>>> JODCOnverter plugs into OO running in server mode.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck,
>>>> Luis
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Vincent Massol
>>>> <vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First you need to package your code as an XWiki plugin
that
>>>>>>>> can be
>>>>>>>> called.
>>>>>>>> This plugin should have as many conversion
possibilities.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doc or office -> xhtml
>>>>>>>> xls -> xhtml
>>>>>>>> doc -> openoffice
>>>>>>>> openoffice ->doc
>>>>>>>> doc -> pdf
>>>>>>>> html -> pdf
>>>>>>>> etc..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hmm not sure. We only need xhtml I think since it's then
the
>>>>>>> role of
>>>>>>> the XWiki HTML Parser to generate an internal DOM. Once we
>>>>>>> have that
>>>>>>> DOM we benefit from all the renderers (PDF, XHTML, RTF,
>>>>>>> Latex, etc).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I second Vincent, for the moment the priority is to have wiki
>>>>>> documents.
>>>>>> But then I agree with Ludovic, that it would be better to
>>>>>> convert
>>>>>> attachments to different formats using the OOo codebase. The pdf
>>>>>> export
>>>>>> done now affects only wiki documents, not attachments, and going
>>>>>> through
>>>>>> a long chain of conversions (.doc -> wiki -> xhtml ->
xsl-fo -
>>>>>> > pdf)
>>>>>> will only introduce possible problems at each conversion,
>>>>>> while a
>>>>>> direct
>>>>>> conversion doc -> pdf using the (better) OOo code is simpler
and
>>>>>> easier.
>>>>>> We can (and should) keep the current PDF export mechanism for
>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>> documents, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should make the PDF export a secondary priority and
>>>>> get the
>>>>> rest working for now. Let's revisit it when all the rest is
>>>>> working
>>>>> fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Concerning xls I think we should look into having an
import
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not go through html
>>>>>>>> We might want to write xls to wiki table
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to this one, too. I think that direct data manipulation
>>>>>> through OOo
>>>>>> is better than reverse-engineering html, and not just for
>>>>>> spreadsheets,
>>>>>> but other types of documents.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>>>>>>
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/