6 Oct
2009
6 Oct
'09
3:37 p.m.
On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
I agree xlet is not very self speaking and so far we've chosen
meaningful names for our top level projects.
+1 for "contrib" (or even with "contribution" which is the more
correct name).
Thanks
-Vincent
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Yeah "contrib" has the advantage of being self-explanatory...
I don't have strong feelings on this. "contrib" makes our job easier
since it's less to explain, so Id be +0 for it over "xlet". Note: It's important to write somewhere
clearly that Xlet projects
are
not done by the xwiki dev team and not supported by the xwiki dev
team
(and thus that the quality depends on the contributor(s)).
+1 with the proposal but I'd prefer to name the project "contrib"
since it's quite common and speaks for itself (particuraly
considering
the comment from Vincent above). WDYT ? Jerome.
> See http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Index+of+%2Fcontrib%22
>
> Thanks,
> JV.