30 Dec
2006
30 Dec
'06
10:15 p.m.
Vincent Massol a écrit :
Just because width is a style attribute and strict XHTML is for data,
use CSS instead to format the page.
W3C design the strict variant of XHTML not to contain layout
information. The goal is to have a separation between data and layout,
like others XML-based languages
read : http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/#xhtml1
Yep :-)
Thanks
-Vincent
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Marc Lijour [mailto:marc@lijour.net]
>>> Sent: jeudi 28 décembre 2006 20:34
>>> To: xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org
>>> Subject: [xwiki-dev] W3C compliance
>>>
>>> xwiki.org home page is not valid html:
>>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xwiki.org
>>>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Lijour [mailto:marc@lijour.net]
Sent: jeudi 28 décembre 2006 23:03
To: xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org
Subject: Re: [xwiki-dev] W3C compliance
On Thursday 28 December 2006 14:44, Vincent Massol wrote:
Thanks. One thing I still don't understand is why using width="80%" on a
<td> element is not XHTML 1.0 strict compliant
Hi Marc,
Thanks for finding this out. That's cool. Do you think you could help
us make it valid HTML?
Apparently you got that covered. I may still help if needed.
(http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xwiki.org). If you know
the answer that'll help.
"the document type you are using does not support that attribute for
this element" ... "use CSS instead of this attribute"
It was written on the error page ;)
Feel free
to open jira issues and attach patches to them
In the future, it would be cool to have this validation as part of
our
build somehow. I haven't researched this but
that would be something
cool to have.
I don't know how the build works. It could be a nice feature. May be
jtidy could do the job.
In this line of idea, you could provide a button somewhere to check the
HTML.
2 options
- use jtidy (included already in the libs)
- use the same site leveraging its REST api (link to
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=${XYZ})
It could be as discrete as a button laying down at the bottom of the
page showing the W3C compliance logo if ok, and showing a bug if not.
Clicking on it could then link to
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=${thispage}.
Actually it could be a cool velocity macro, doesn't it?