oops "The fastest growing extension repository is npm, while it's smaller than
maven or rubygems, it's getting new packages at almost twice the rate of
maven, the next competitor" [citation needed]
Making things easy for developers is quite interesting
to me because I'm
a developer and I like scratching my own itches.
more inline:
On 06/29/2013 05:41 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
While XWiki has many great advantages as a
framework which takes car of
persistence, forms, user management, content management and provides tons
of APIs, when traditional developers want to extend XWiki there are facing
a few difficulties:
- they are lost in the myriad of XWiki APIs, and there is no completion
- they don't get good visibility of the code available in their application
- it is complicated to use editors which have syntax highlighting
- they cannot use their favorite IDE
On the framework side there are also some improvements which could make
XWiki even more killer:
- easier integration of advanced JS framework
- advanced integration of a high level JS framework that has templating
(maybe angular js)
- better validation functions
- easier way to add REST APIs
- more XWiki and better documented javascript apis
Here are some proposals to help fix the tools issues. Three approaches can
be looked at:
1/ Live Sync between an XWiki Instance and and improved maven xar file
structure, allowing to use any local IDE on XWiki code
First it should be possible to use any IDE on the maven xar file structure,
allowing to open the content and textarea fields of all XML files.
For this XWiki XML files should externalize the content and textarea fields
in separate files with extensions based on their content type.
The maven xar format should be able to clean the maven structure to do this
splitting and should also be able to build the XAR from all the files.
Finally a program should allow to do a live sync between a local or remote
wiki instance and the maven project. Any change in either the wiki or the
file system should be replicated to the other party.
So if you run "git pull" then your local or remote wiki would be updated.
If a change is made in the wiki, the change would show up in the file
system and your IDE would refresh it.
The sync program would keep a state of the version in the wiki, in order to
be able to merge changes if changes occur in both places between two sync.
This tool could be easily launched with "mvn xar:sync"
Syntax highlighting for XWiki Syntax+Velocity+Groovy would be developped
for the most popular editors.
When syncing the tool could show syntax checking error messages.
I actually implemented part of this for my own personal toolkit.
I presented it on the list to great fanfair here:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/A-new-XWiki-Model-sort-of-td7585722.html
I have the xar generation and push to XWiki in a 4 or 5 second post operation.
The format is more makefile-esque so it's not really good for live sync but
I have been using it and have not yet thrown it across the room which is a
good indication that it's probably technologically sound.
2/ Integration with Eclipse
Based on XEclipse, we would build an Eclipse plugin to be able to connect
to an XWiki instance and load a specified list of spaces. Then each space
would be organized by the type of code in this space. Content and Textarea
fields would be made visible as editable content in Eclipse.
The plugin should detect the type of code in each of the content or
textarea fields (velocity/html, groovy, javascript, css, translations,
xwiki syntax) and use the appropriate editor.
Finally a completion module could be provided by loading from the server a
list of available APIs.
The same plugin could also be able to organize the content from a local
maven project (based on 1/) and provide completion to such a project.
Live syntax checking could be provided.
3/ Integration of a WebIDE in XWiki
Based on Javascript WebIDE and web code editor softwares (Orion, Cloud9,
exoIDE, codemirror, etc..), we would provide a view on the code inside the
XWiki instance.
Code would be organized in the same way as in the Eclipse plugin and
appropriate editors would be used depending on the code type.
Completion could be provided in the velocity and groovy editors and
eventually in Javascript
Two views should be available, one for each AWM application, and one with
all the code in the Wiki.
Live syntax checking could be provided.
If we decide this is a priority, it's something which I could investigate
and would be able to reuse experience and tools from the Resilience project.
Solution 1/ is very powerful because it let's the user decide which is his
development environment, even if the tree structure won't be perfect. Still
he can see all the code in the wiki and work on it, including searching.
Committing is made very easy. There are some risks involved in the sync
process, particularly of you have multiple developers syncing local code
with the same dev server.
User can switch from local sync (local wiki) to remove sync (remove shared
wiki) and can therefore work offline more easily. Editing can be fully done
offline.
Providing syntax highlighting for many editors might prove difficult.
Solution 2/ is providing a nice XWiki environment inside Eclipse, without
the need for a local copy of the code. Committing would happen using the
browser.
Solution 3/ is the long term bet as the future is to have everything in the
web. Content is only in one place which makes things a little easier.
Development environment needs no setup.
However this is more "new" for developers which need to adopt the platform.
Live syntax checking is hard to provide but would be quite useful.
Alternatively mvn xar:format could also provide syntax checking for XWiki
syntax, velocity, groovy, js and css.
WDYT ? Which approaches do you believe would be the most promising.
#1 can be many things. It could be as simple as my little .xar generator
with ability to post to a live wiki. It could be as complex as an XWiki
filesystem which you'd mount with nfs or something.
If we commit to a directory structure, it is going to require a lot of
thought to make that structure coherent and once we commit to it, we're
kind of stuck with it.
#3 is easy at first then it gets hard. We can pull in an editor and if
we find an editor which supports ctags then we get completion for a
reasonable price. The problem is ctags (and most editors) don't support
velocity so if we want to autocomplete velocity we end up hacking
something together and making a few demos then it's forgotten, or worse
we write everything in-house to really support production ready velocity
completion and then we're saddled with maintaining another 15k LoC that
no other project has any interest in.
http://ctags.sourceforge.net/languages.html
If what we want is extensions then we should go after extensions directly.
The fastest growing extension repository is npm, while it's smaller than
maven or rubygems, it's getting new packages at almost twice the rate of
maven, the next competitor. My recommendation is to move in the
#1 direction but specifically targeting XWiki extensions by copying the
npm workflow.
Thanks,
Caleb
Ludovic
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs