4 Jan
2008
4 Jan
'08
6:20 p.m.
On Jan 4, 2008, at 6:03 PM, justanotheradress wrote:
Sergiu Dumitriu-2 wrote:
I'd think so. A license doesn't make much sense if you don't
distribute your work... ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
The core must be kept under LGPL. Extensions/plugins can have any
licence compatible with LGPL.
Can you maybe provide a good link who tells me which licenses are
compatible
with LGPL? Is "no license" (because not published) also allowed?