17 Aug
2009
17 Aug
'09
5:53 p.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
All errors will be reported anyway, the C2 is only for demonstration purposes,
to see how it looks (we wanted to check if how would the error below look like
in the context of multiple errors).
so that's another vote for B.
On Aug 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Anca Paula Luca wrote:
B is about Guillaume's initial proposal in this thread (dialog title + step
title + step description for each wizard step).
Hi devs,
I'd like to have your opinion on punctual approaches for the
consistent design
of the wysiwyg dialogs. Please vote and comment on the issues
discussed at:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendix
.
We specifically need to make decisions on the following topics:
1.
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendi…
+1 for A
+1 for A (left aligned) but then I couldn't understand what B is about
(lots of text to read...). 2.
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendi…
+0.2 for E, +0.4 for F, +0.4 for H
+1 for H (ie "Required" text) but with the orange color on the field
name + "Required part.
I like "Required" since it makes it obvious and doesn't require a
legend (Using "*" would require a legend).
+1 for C2 (ie all errors reported) but with error text above field
(and not below as in C2).
For tree: +1 for D
I agree that D looks a lot better for the tree, but style-wise it's inconsistent
with the other errors in wizard forms. The trees / lists are still forms, part
of the same wizard and I think they should all look the same.
Thanks for your votes,
Anca
Thanks
-Vincent
+1 for B
WDYT?
Thanks a lot,
Anca
Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> Anca asked me to finalize the overall look of dialog boxes in the
> WYSIWYG so
> that she can work on it and polish it for the 2.0 release. Right
> now the
> issue is that we're using a different look for the link, image &
> macro
> dialog boxes which poses a consistency problem.
>
> I've been working with Cati on a proposal for the look of the
> overall box -
> not for the inner part of the box. Proposals for the
> standardization of the
> inner part of the box will come later. The dialog box uses a wizard-
> like
> look and follows the vertical form principles proposed by Cati in a
> previous
> email (thus the primary action button at the bottom left, to follow
> the
> user's eye flow). Its "hidden" features are:
>
> - Buttons can be in an enabled or disabled mode depending of what
> the
> current step is
> - All buttons are displayed all the time so that they don't move
> from one
> screen to the next
> - Buttons' labels are configurable
> - There is no "Cancel" button, the cross at the top right of the
> dialog
> box plays that role
> - The title in the top bar doesn't change and its name is the
> same as the
> associated toolbar button (clicking on "Link" opens a dialog box
> called
> "Link")
> - The "Wizard Step Title" reflects what's happening at the
> current step:
> "Page Selection" , "Code Macro" , "Image Selection"
> - The description tells the user what to do at the current step:
> "Select
> the page to link to" , "Select the image to insert" , "Fill in
> macro
> parameters"
> - Double-clicking on an item (an image, a page name) acts in the
> same
> fashion as selecting it and clicking the "Next" button. If the
> "Next" button
> is disabled at the current step, double-clicking works as the
> primary action
> ("Insert" , "Create")
>
> The mockups are located at:
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Mockups/
> GenericMacroDialog
>
> WDYT?
>
> Guillaume
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs