11 Feb
2016
11 Feb
'16
12:24 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:09 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 11 Feb 2016 at 12:07:45, Eduard Moraru (enygma2002(a)gmail.com) wrote:
+1. It`s always good to have some guidance.
Also, the project lead field should be a bit more useful than a name. Maybe
github account, IRC handle or something like this might be useful as well,
as a means of contacting the person. It won`t always be well known XWiki
committers there.
Link to the xwiki.org user profile page? (there the user can put whatever info he wants
to be found)
We should probably add a field in the profile for the github account.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:03 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 10 Feb 2016 at 15:01:54, Thomas Mortagne (thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com)
wrote:
+1 to provide this template on contrib.xwiki.org as a best practice
for those who want to use it but not a big fan of making it a rule
Yes it would be an ecouraged best practice.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau
<guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs +1 for the first proposal. Having informations in
the github repo is more
friendly.
2016-02-10 14:53 GMT+01:00 vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 10 Feb 2016 at 14:43:53, Alexandru Cotiuga (
alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com
> (mailto:alexandru.cotiuga@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>
> > + 1
> > I would also propose to add the Java version needed for release
(instead
> of
> > digging in the hierarchy to find out this information)
>
> I don’t agree. I think we should only put the minimal number of
> information as it’s very tedious to ensure that the info is in sync.
Right
> now I’ve put only what I think is the minimal
info. Also the Java
version
> is checked during the build so you cannot
have it wrong.
>
> OTOH I see there’s a link to Translations on l10n. I think that’s a good
> idea for apps that support internationalization. Would be optional.
>
> > and maybe there are
> > some other particular steps to follow when a release is performed.
>
> The template is about the minimal that need to be displayed. We should
> mention that of course each repo should add whatever information it
> needs/wants to that README.
>
> > A good
> > example would be:
> >
>
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager/blob/master/README…
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs