13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
11:34 p.m.
On 01/10/2011 12:49 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
+1 also for page, for the same reasons raised by
others
BUT : could we have it as a variable in the admin ? We could imagine situations where it
is important for the user to name it document, and to name a space as "folder",
or "application".
No, this is going to do more harm than good. What do we write in the
documentation? Do we make 2-3 sets of screenshots to show the possible
display variants?
More : as we have page type management, could we have
generic page types (page, document, code, etc.) with specific icon in the UI ? Same with
spaces (space, project, application, etc.)
Valid idea for the future.
Le 7 janv. 2011 à 16:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on
> different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example).
> There is also an issue referring to this problem
> XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to
> find an answer in order to move forward consistency.
>
> So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document"
?
>
> I'm voting +1 for "Page".
>
> "Page" is more used IMO, especially in the
"Space"/"Page" context.
> "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a
platform that
> encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents).
>
> Please cast your vote.
> Thanks,
> Caty
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/