Hi,
Caty, do you have the error with the latest git repo as well?
Actually the leaflet-commons require leaflet but the functions are not
actually called anywhere without the leaflet dependency used in require.
There is no error on my or Stephane side.
I have the 11.3-rc version of XWiki.
You can try Ctrl+F5 for a complete new load of the resources.
Best,
Fawad
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 10:22 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Some notes:
- We don't have guidelines regarding the singular / plural thing. I'm glad
that on the new sources we don't have the Maps/Map anymore. I'm fine with
Maps. In practice we have a mix of singular (like Diagram, Calendar,
Meeting) and plural (like Ideas, Forums). I prefer the plural version,
although in practice I think we have more with singular. There was a
tentative old draft for having such guidelines
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ApplicationGuidelines
but we didn't worked on it for some time.
- Regarding the new Git repository. Since you've committed the initial
commits in issues, you should do a release with the initial version, and
than just release a new version for the interactive-maps-new . It's normal
in an application's development flow that changes happen, that's why
versioning schemes are all about.
- I still have the error I've mentioned before :
Uncaught Error: Script error for "leaflet", needed by: leafletSearch
http://requirejs.org/docs/errors.html#scripterror
at F (require.min.js?r=1:7)
at HTMLScriptElement.onScriptError (require.min.js?r=1:30)
leaflet.css:1 Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status
of 404 (Not Found)
so I cannot actually test the build, since I don't see the maps. I have
this both on Chrome and Firefox. Do I need to do something?
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 2:31 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadali98(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, I forgot to mention it before but we will need a better and more
> expressive way to show popups. We need something that can accomodate
> sufficient amount of text with a scroll if the information exceeds the page.
> I will prepare a mockup for this once I am done with some of the next
> steps.
>
> And I think we should use the colortheme colors for our map controls and
> consequently for the popups. I will update you on that as well.
>
> Best,
> Fawad
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:31 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadali98(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephane, Caty and all,
>> Hope you are doing fine.
>>
>> I am glad you brought up the topic of custom marker icon. I am well
>> aware of the issue. Actually there are two problems with custom markers.
>> - The icon offset
>> - The document attachment
>>
>> For the icon offset, when I tried to fix it initially it seemed that I
>> can overcome the offset either by height or width which means that the
>> offset still exists from a single side so I had that postponed since I
>> thought solr query tasks take priority.
>>
>> For the attachment, for now I am getting the first attachment (0th
>> index) from the Point page which is not very reliable. For example if we
>> have images on the page, it could be that the marker takes one of the
>> attachments even if the user did not want a custom icon or an image
>> different from what the user wanted to choose is selected as the marker
>> icon.
>>
>> What I have in mind is that we define categories for marker icons
>> dynamically.
>> We could make a separate dedicated page "MarkerIcons" and attach
>> multiple images to it. Then these images could appear in a list as one of
>> the properties in the Point object where we can choose the icon from. WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fawad
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019, 11:31 AM Stéphane Laurière <slauriere(a)xwiki.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Fawad, Thanks for letting us know, I could install the new app version,
>>> I confirm that all the changes you added to the progress file (very handy)
>>> work for me, and the refactoring is ok. I noticed a minor issue that
you're
>>> certainly aware of already: it seems there's a small offset between the
>>> custom marker position (with the Islamabad point) and the popup position.
>>>
>>> Talk to you soon,
>>>
>>> Stéphane
>>>
>>>
>>> Fawad Ali:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the detailed review, Stephane. I have made the changes you
>>> suggested with some next steps also done.
>>> >
>>> > Furthermore, I will make changes to the application space once we
>>> have confirmed response from Caty or other developers.
>>> > I have started to work on the other next steps and will provide with
>>> updates soon.
>>> >
>>> > The original github repo is also updated, so future updates will be
>>> available at
>>>
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-interactive-maps.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Fawad
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stéphane Laurière
>>> XWiki –
https://xwiki.com
>>>
>>>
>>>