31 Jul
2014
31 Jul
'14
9:25 a.m.
My personal opinion is that it's OK to save a bit of time and remove the
code entirely, the retro-compat documentation would in this case be
"if you use syntax/1.0, you now need to edit it using the wikitext editor".
It's not as if their data will nolonger be accessible.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 07/30/2014 11:32 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
- xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to your instance if
you need it.
What do others think?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent