2 Jul
2012
2 Jul
'12
7:32 p.m.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 06/15/2012 08:28 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Not a huge fan either, though there are some interesting things prototype
does not have, like the "live" observers.
Hi devs,
Now that all the scripts on the Internets are implemented as jQuery
plugins, should we bite the bullet and make it easier for extensions
developers to integrate such scripts ?
Note it would not necessarily mean we use it ourselves in web/XE.
If we don't do something about it, there is the risk that many extensions
bring their own jQuery to the party, which will translate in slower page
loads and more importantly a less enjoyable extension developer
experience.
An alternative idea would be an "official" jQuery extension (with a JSX)
that other extensions can depend upon, should they need jQuery.
What do you think ?
Jerome
Using jQuery in XWiki is not a very easy task, so indeed it's a good idea
to provide our own integration known to work.
Personally I'm not a fan of jQuery, but I agree that it's the most popular
JS framework, and most JS widgets/libraries are built on top of it, so you
have my +1.
Packaging, I think that it should be placed on the filesystem in
resources/js/jquery/, it shouldn't be used by default, and we try to bundle
the most recent version available at the time of the release. If someone
needs a more recent version, they should update XWiki as well.
When you say bundled, you mean its script tag in the rendered pages ? Or
just present in the resources/ folder on the FS ?
I would say, script tag included, otherwise it does not solve much.
Jerome
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
______________________________**_________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/ma…
--
Jérôme Velociter
Winesquare
http://www.winesquare.net/