Hi Caty,
If you think it’s important to see all RN for a cycle, we could implement what I
mentioned, ie a second LT showing only cycles (and thus introduce a new xobject). Let me
know what you think and whether it’s overkill or not?
Thanks
-Vincent
Le 18 déc. 2018 à 13:51, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> a écrit :
Hi Caty,
On 18 Dec 2018, at 11:39, Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't want to drop it, since it helped me have a grouped release notes
per cycle.
I really don’t see the need, could you explain?
Especially since it contains release from when
the Release Notes app didn't
existed (< 8.2). Also you cannot make the livetable "Version" filter say:
"start with 8.", since you will also have results like "10.8" if you
are
filtering for "8.x". So these pages list only the valid releases and in the
correct order.
Honestly this is overkill and I’m pretty sure that it’s ok for users.They can type “8.”
for ex and even if that would match “6.4.8”, it’s very much usable IMO.
Regarding RN for versions < 8.2, there’s already a RN Archives page here:
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/Archives
So what you have put for 7.x, 8.x and 9.x is already a duplicate of what we have at
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/Archives ;)
My only point is that we shouldn’t reinvent the wheel. If you want to improve the RN app
then cool but please let’s not redo it! :)
Thanks
-Vincent
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Caty,
>
>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 13:03, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds ok.
>>
>> I just want to let you know that regarding cycles, there are 2 pages:
>> * 1 archive page that has like a toc of links to all the releases in the
>> cycle + link to summary, example:
>>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/
>
> Yes I’ve seen this page but I don’t feel it’s very interesting. I think
> it’s duplicating the existing LT and doesn’t add a lot of value. I’d be in
> favor of dropping it. WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> * 1 that contains the summary, example:
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/Summa…
>>
>> If we were not to add this xobject, alternatively we could manually list
>> the cycle archive page, but I guess the xobject is a more scalable
>> solution.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 1:30 PM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> This is especially for Caty who created:
>>> *
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/Summa…
>>> *
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki8x/Summa…
>>> *
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki9x/Summa…
>>> *
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki10x/Summ…
>>>
>>> Right now these summaries don’t appear on
>>>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/
>>>
>>> I’m proposing to simply add a ReleaseNotes.Code.ReleaseNoteClass xobject
>>> to them so that they can appear in the RN LT, and to use the following
>>> xproperty values:
>>>
>>> * Product: XWiki
>>> * Version: 7.x, 8.x, 9.x, 10.x
>>> * Is released: true
>>> * Release Date: 31/12/<year>
>>>
>>> The alternative is more complex and involves creating a new XClass for
>>> Cycle Summaries and modifying the home page to list cycle summaries in
> a LT
>>> (so that it can scale). Of course we could also do a lightweight
> version by
>>> simply having a link on the home page to a cycle summary page listing
> links
>>> to individual summaries. It would be less visible but could be
> acceptable.
>>> However, the best and easiest is for me to add the
>>> ReleaseNotes.Code.ReleaseNoteClass xobjects to Cycle RN pages.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent