5 Mar
2011
5 Mar
'11
3:18 p.m.
+1, Great ! but...
Should not the feedback form be also accessible without triggering a
download ?
I can imagine that you can want to came back to it later, and it will
trigger the download again, which is not expected.
Denis
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 18:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented the proposed version
enterprise
http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
manager
http://manager.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
watch
http://watch.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
xeclipse
http://xeclipse.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
xoffice
http://xoffice.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
Please vote on this versions.
This variant deprecates xwiki:Main.Download and will need also a change in
Panels.Download that will relate to the local Main.Download instead of the
global xwiki: link.
The feedback form is activated so we will receive the messages, but there
is
only one general form and the messages are redirected just to one email
address. Some developer needs to fix this in order for the companies
checkbox to work.
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 16:05, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownlo…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownlo…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownlo…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadMa…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadEn…
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadEn…
contain
the
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/SatisfactionSurveyProducts(let&#…
questions together)
foundation
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi Caty,
That's good to me. I believe it's a good first version that we can tune
later on.
I'm +1 to implement it like this for now.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadRe…
Hi,
*Design proposal:*
*Mockups:*
XWiki Enterprise Manager Download Page
XWiki Enterprise Download Page - Part 1
XWiki Enterprise Download Page - Part 2
Thanks,
Caty
P.S.* Prototypes* (with incubator style):
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:17, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for your feedback on my previous mail on this topic. I've
discussed
> it more with Gregory and Emilie and
here's what we'd like to propose
now:
>>
>> * Add a Profesional Services heading on the download which would > **
Some text explaining about community support and linking to
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support (which already
describes
> community support)
> ** A livetable containing companies offering professional services for
> XWiki. The columns would be:
> *** Logo
> *** Company name
> *** Number of active committers
> *** Link to the correct anchor on the Support page (
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support)
> ** The livetable would only show 3 entries
> ** The livetable would be sorted by active committers by default
> ** A text that explains how to add a new company to the list and which
> would point to the Governance page (
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance)
>
> * We will remove the current XWiki SAS support link since that
information
> will be moved to the livetable
>
> * Rework the download page so that when a download link is clicked, it
> opens a new page containing the feedback questionnaire while the
download
>> happens
>> ** Note that for this to be technically possible I propose to remove > link
to the OW2 mirrors and instead link to the only existing mirror
(OW2
> seems to have only 1...). If not, we would
need some code to compute
which
> OW2 mirror to use based on the location.
>
> * The feedback questionnaire page would contain the following:
> ** The following questionnaire:
>
>> ** The questionnaire would start with a
first question asking to which
>> companies it should be sent to. We would list all companies offering
>> professional support (using checkboxes) with a special text for the
top
one
>> ("Top contributor") and in parenthesis listing the number of active
>> committers. For example:
>>
>> [ ] XWiki SAS - Top contributor with 15 active committers
>> [ ] Softec - 1 active committer
>>
>> ** A text explaining that it's optional and what the questionnaire
will
be
the
> used for, i.e. that
> *** it will be published anonymously on xwiki.org to improve the
product
>> *** it will be sent to the companies for which the user has checked box
it
>
>
> We've tried to design this proposal with taking 2 ideas into account:
> 1) that it's fair and that all companies can have a fair visibility
> 2) that it's visible which companies contribute the most (to reward
their
> contributions)
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi devs and everyone,
>>
>> Emilie has proposed the following content to be added to the Download
> page (http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download):
>>
>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/TextDownload
>>
>> The idea is twofold:
>> 1) to get feedback about what people think about our software.
>> 2) some people who download the XWiki software from xwiki.org don't
know
>> that XWiki SAS has a commercial offerings and could be interested by >>>
>>> The pros for the community are:
>>> 1) XWiki SAS will publish back the result of the feedback it receives
>> from the download form which will allow us to fine tune and improve
the
>
software
>> 2) XWiki SAS could get more business (from people who want to buy
> support, dev work, hosting, etc) which will mean accrued budget for
paying
> developers and resources to work on the XWiki
project
>>
>> Note 1: the form would be of course optional
>> Note 2: in the future I'd like to see a not for profit foundation to
> handle xwiki.org, the xwiki open source project, donations, etc. When
this
> happens we could elect from member for the
foundation and have the
feedback
>> form sent to that foundation for example, with members of the >> having access to the data (for
example).
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent Massol, acting as both CTO of XWiki SAS and XWiki open
source
>
developer
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs