On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose to improve the Component Override mechanism (currently based on
component-overrides.txt, see
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Component+Module#HOver…). We have
a limitation right now in that we can only have one level of override. The issue is that
we need more levels even right now since we have component impls in xwiki-commons or
xwiki-rendering that are overridden in xwiki-platform (thus using
component-overrides.txt). This means that users cannot provide their own implementations.
Thus I'd like to propose the following:
* Deprecate the component-overrides.txt file
We could maybe keep this system to allow an admin to choose an
implementation he wants whatever the priority setup of each impl. So
it would only be used in WEB-INF/classes basically.
Yes but I think it's better to be the simplest possible. What they can do easily is
put a component.txt in WEB-INF/classes for ex and override whatever component impl for
there. All they need to do is ensure that they provide their own component.txt first in
the classloader, so IMO it's enough (especially since I doubt it's going to happen
and it would be a bug for someone to release a library based on our component and using a
priority of 1 for ex).
Thanks
-Vincent
* Add an
optional priority level number that you can specify in the components.txt
* I propose the following format in components.txt: <priority level>:<full
package path to implementation as it is now>. Ex:
1000:org.xwiki.rendering.internal.macro.DefaultMacroManager
* Use a default priority of 1000 when not specified (same as for our Macro)
* Guarantee in the documentation that all components that the XWiki project provides
never have priorities under, say, 100. This is so that users who want to override know
that if they use a priority under 100 their impls will always win.
* Use a priority of 500 in platform when overriding components found in commons or
rendering.
Here's my +1
+1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs