3 Jul
2014
3 Jul
'14
11:16 a.m.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Thomas,
On 3 Jul 2014 at 11:02:42, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
By default you get a diff between what you curently have and what you
will get if you click continue, I don't see how this require the user
"to know the algorithm and compute it in his head".
Hi devs,
from time to time we get a proposed merge which is not very accurate
in a conflict for a single line field which can sometime be quite a
pain when that content is velocity like in document titles. Many users
just clic "continue" button without looking at the conflict and end up
with a bad title.
Actually what would help a lot is a preview of what you’d get with the selected conflict
options because otherwise the user to know the algorithm and compute it in his head by
checking the previous value, the changes done to the page and the new values and that’s
not easy at all. By default we pretty much have two choices for
single line fields:
1/ continue trying to do a 3 ways merge
2/ do not do any 3 ways merge (or see it as a line based merge which
pretty much mean the same thing). Like at any level merge default on
current in case of conflict so the proposed merge for this field would
be to do nothing basically
WDYT ?
1/ support simple use case without displaying an annoying conflict UI
but it also means being almost sure to have bad title in more complex
use cases if you just click continue
I guess 2/ is a bit safer.
I prefer to be on the safe side with 2 (line-based merge), hoping that the user will not
have to resolve too many conflicts when upgrading…
It would be interesting to try out an upgrade, from some existing real life version (from
xwiki.org or myxwiki.org for ex) to a new XWiki version having 2/ implemented and see how
many more conflicts would be generated.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs