8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
10:05 a.m.
Jim Stuttard a écrit :
Ok.. I'll look into this..
Ludovic
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:02:36 +0200, Ludovic Dubost
<ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
In this case, I would say you have to have your application be
reviewed.. I don't think it's an issue with the tool, but an issue with
the process.
It's not because a tool gives the possibility to users to modify that it
should be used in all cases !
So the 5% errors is not that bad.. With network
tools I
think we can improve the model. The good thing about programming in
XWiki is that you can have much more easily experienced people review
what end-users have done. People that have the content knowledge can
more easily share the work with people that are the programmers. They
can work together in the same tool.. This is not the case of the more
classical approach of separating application design from application
usage.
Can't have 5% errors in exam result data. You wouldn't implement a
spreadsheet without testing it. Yes.. I've
been relunctant to build a roadmap because there wasn't the
actual critical mass to implement it.. I tend to view a roadmap
something on whcih we would commit.. Now we could do some sort of
tentative roadmap without dates showing our priorities..
That would be great, I'm sure everyone would really appreciate your
architectural vision without obligation :-).