20 Jan
2011
20 Jan
'11
11:09 a.m.
Hello,
I think that pages should be used for everything that is exposed to end
users. From an end user perspective, there is no difference between a page
and a document, so there is no point in using 2 different wordings. Page
makes more sense IMO.
Document should be used for XWik advanced users.
--
Thibaut
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 01/10/2011 12:49 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
+1 also for page, for the same reasons raised by
others
BUT : could we have it as a variable in the admin ? We could imagine
situations
where it is important for the user to name it document, and to
name a space as "folder", or "application".
No, this is going to do more harm than good. What do we write in the
documentation? Do we make 2-3 sets of screenshots to show the possible
display variants?
More : as we have page type management, could we
have generic page types
(page, document, code, etc.) with specific icon in the UI ?
Same with spaces
(space, project, application, etc.)
Valid idea for the future.
Le 7 janv. 2011 à 16:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on
> different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example).
> There is also an issue referring to this problem
> XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to
> find an answer in order to move forward consistency.
>
> So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document"
?
>
> I'm voting +1 for "Page".
>
> "Page" is more used IMO, especially in the
"Space"/"Page" context.
> "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a
platform
that
> encapsulates all kind of content (not just
documents).
>
> Please cast your vote.
> Thanks,
> Caty
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs