10 Mar
2007
10 Mar
'07
8:41 p.m.
I am for not including the Selenium app in the default wiki, unless
it's a special debuggers build, because I am skeptical that this will
have any benefit for most end users.
My vote is 0.
Catalin
On 3/9/07, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I now think we should not include it for now as in any case:
1) We don't have enough tests yet. We need a bare minimum. So we need to
work
on the Selenium app to include more tests for now. We do need an easy
way for developers and for contributors to add tests. I think we should
install an instance somewhere, maybe on test.xwiki.org?
2) We need to work on it so that becomes extremely easy to use and we
should
probably provide some user guide once we learn more how to use it.
Right now I have only done 1 test (test registration of a user) which was
real easy to do but I've quickly tried using it on the WYSIWYG editor and it
wasn't as easy (for example we're missing some names, class id, etc to make
it easy for Selenium to find HTML elements).
Thus if you're ok I'll remove it from the default wiki but I'll create
another wiki (wikis/test for example) which will be the wiki we could upload
on test.xwiki.org for example and where we can ask the community to help in
writing tests.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
You're right. It's better for the moment not to include it. We need to make
people visit test.xwiki.org 'cause none of the xpn members can spare time
for it.
Sergiu
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org
mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws