On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Laurent Lunati wrote:
I vote +1 for 4, and i don't consider 3 as a
valid proposal
Could you explain why?
Thanks
-Vincent
Le 28 nov. 08 à 08:31, Marius Dumitru Florea a écrit
:
> I'm not a big fan of step wizards thus I'm more into proposal 3. See
> other comments below.
>
> Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Vincent Massol
>> <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>> Re the image selection:
>>> * It would be much much better to see the images before choosing
>>> them
>>> (the preview comes too late). You cannot choose an image on its
>>> name
>>> alone that's too hard.
>>
>> The only solution I see for this is to have a tooltip with a preview
>> in the treeview.
>
> The user would be forced to use the mouse in order to see the
> preview.
>
>>
>>> * What is the camera icon doing? Is it just an image?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> * How do I enter advanced parameters for images?
>>
>> This mockup is about the wiki explorer, I've put the example of the
>> image insertion but this part is not to be taken as a proposal.
>>
>>> Apart from this it looks good to me but I still have a small
>>> preference for 3 since
>>> - as a user I prefer to see all options to understand where I'll
>>> find
>>> the feature I'm looking for
>>
>> s/user/power user/
>
> The WYSIWYG addresses power users also.
>
>>
>>> - it's one click less
>>
>> IMHO an extra click is only a problem if the user has to think where
>> to click and why to click.
>> I agree that 2 or more extra clicks are a problem but only one, with
>> the action button always at the very same place, no.
>
> What I find sometimes annoying is going back and forth through a
> wizard.
> I admit a wizard fills more secure the first few times it's being
> used,
> but for me it can get annoying the more I'm using it.
>
> So I'm more into proposal 3, but I'm not against 4.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>>
>>> Re your arguments below we can have the same with option 3.
>>
>> I don't think so, actually that's why I came up with 4).
>>
>> JV.